Table 1.
Performance comparisons for TCFs based on graphene and carbon nanotubes
| Material | Preparation method | Transmittance (% at 300 Ω/sq sheet resistance) | Sheet resistance (Ω/sq at 90% transmittance) | Flexibility | Stretchability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Random network CNTs [108] | Spray & AuCl3 doping | 95.7 | 110 | O | O |
| Yarning CNTs [103] | Laser trimming & Metal deposition | 91 | 208 | O | O |
| CVD Graphene [117] | Layer-by-layer doping | 97 | 108 | O | O |
| CNT-Graphene hybrid [123] | Solid-phase layer-stacking | 70 | 735 | O | O |
| Metal-Graphene hybrid [124] | Metal grid & Graphene transfer | - | 20 | O | O |
| ITO [104] | Sputtering | 91 | 80 | Poor | - |