Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 5;11:433. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00433

Table 3.

Within-subject similarity of topographies across nights.

Comparison Correlation Classification
N R Pcorr < 0.05 I ≥ II II ≥ I
Sigma power Slow N2 24 0.67 ± 0.21*** 96% 71%*** 58%***
N3 24 0.56 ± 0.25*** 92% 38%*** 46%***
Fast N2 26 0.69 ± 0.20*** 96% 46%*** 54%***
N3 26 0.53 ± 0.23*** 88% 23%*** 15%**
Spindle density Slow N2 24 0.60 ± 0.26*** 92% 33%*** 46%***
N3 24 0.52 ± 0.32*** 75% 25%*** 46%***
Fast N2 26 0.46 ± 0.22*** 77% 35%*** 23%***
N3 26 0.24 ± 0.25 *** 46% 15%** 19%***
Spindle amplitude Slow N2 23 0.64 ± 0.25*** 91% 43%*** 48%***
N3 17 0.57 ± 0.26*** 88% 47%*** 47%***
Fast N2 25 0.59 ± 0.26*** 88% 48%*** 40%***
N3 16 0.53 ± 0.22*** 88% 31%*** 38%***

R: Pearson correlation coefficient; Pcorr < 0.05: percentage of subjects with False Discovery Rate-corrected P values < 0.05; I ≥ II and II ≥ I: classification direction. Significance levels (correlation: one-sample t-test vs. zero; classification: binomial test) indicated by ** < 0.01; *** < 0.001. Note: cases where spindles were not detected on every channel were excluded from spindle amplitude analyses.