Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 16;274(10):3711–3722. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4679-4

Table 2.

Demographic data and surgical technique for the total cohort and each surgical method/indication group. Comparison of sex, age, cold/hot dissection and haemostasis for TT ± A obstruction versus TE ± A obstruction, and TE ± A obstruction versus TE ± A infection

Method indication Total (n = 32,225) TT ± A obstruction (n = 18,109) TE ± A obstruction (n = 7204) TE ± A infection (n = 6700) TT ± A obstruction versus TE ± A obstruction (p value) TE ± A obstruction versus TE ± A infection (p value)
Sex
 Male 17,117 (53.1%) 10,291 (56.8%) 3915 (54.3%) 2811 (42.0%)
 Female 15,108 (46.9%) 7818 (43.2%) 3289 (45.7%) 3889 (58.0%) 0.0003 <0.0001
Age
 Mean (SD) 7.14 (4.57) 5.37 (2.90) 7.22 (4.53) 11.8 (5.0)
 Median 5.52 4.59 5.54 13.0
 Min; max 1.04; 18.0 1.04; 17.98 1.09; 18:00 1.4; 18:0 <0.0001 <0.0001
Technique for dissectiona
 Cold 10,729 (34.2%) 462 (2.6%) 5485 (79.0%) 4753 (73.3%)
 Hot 20,681 (65.8%) 17,315 (97.4%) 1458 (21.0%) 1732 (26.7%) <0.0001 <0.0001
Technique for haemostasisb
 Cold 9503 (32.0%) 6884 (42.8%) 1456 (20.9%) 1102 (17.1%)
 Hot 20,162 (68.0%) 9205 (57.2%) 5504 (79.1%) 5334 (82.9%) <0.0001  < 0.0001

SD standard deviation, n number of responds on 30-day survey, TE ± A tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy, TT ± A tonsillotomy with or without adenoidectomy

aCold dissection technique: cold steel. Hot dissection technique: radiofrequency, bipolar diathermy scissors, bipolar diathermy, ultracision and multiple techniques where one or more techniques were hot. Missing value n = 815

bCold haemostasis technique: none, infiltration with epinephrine, ties, suture ligature. Hot haemostasis technique: unipolar diathermy, bipolar diathermy, radiofrequency and multiple techniques where one or more techniques were hot. Missing value n = 2560. TT ± A indication infection group (n = 212) is only presented in total and not in a separate group