Table 3.
Study 1: Regression results for three-way interaction outcomes.
| Variable | OCB-I |
I-Dev |
Turnover intentions |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | t | p | B | SE | t | p | B | SE | t | p | |
| Constant | 5.66 | 0.21 | 26.02 | 0.00 | 1.57 | 0.14 | 10.95 | 0.00 | 1.86 | 0.25 | 7.54 | 0.00 |
| Status | –0.07 | 0.17 | –0.45 | 0.65 | –0.07 | 0.10 | –0.63 | 0.53 | 0.38 | 0.19 | 2.01 | 0.05 |
| Ostracism | –0.85 | 0.31 | –2.73 | 0.01 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 2.01 | 0.05 | 1.22 | 0.35 | 3.46 | 0.01 |
| Status × Ostracism | 0.38 | 0.21 | 2.00 | 0.05 | 0.42 | 0.16 | 2.69 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.71 |
| Support | –0.33 | 0.30 | –0.38 | –0.71 | –0.28 | 0.24 | –0.40 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.35 | 2.09 | 0.04 |
| Ostracism × Support | 0.24 | 0.43 | 0.54 | 0.58 | –0.11 | 0.28 | –0.38 | 0.71 | –0.84 | 0.49 | –2.04 | 0.05 |
| Status × Support | 0.87 | 0.24 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.46 | 0.65 | –0.46 | 0.27 | –1.73 | 0.10 |
| Ostracism × Status × Support | –0.65 | 0.31 | –2.03 | 0.05 | 0.43 | 0.22 | 2.04 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 0.53 | 0.59 |
N = 295. Status, hierarchical status of ostracizer; Support, perceived external support.