Table 5.
Study 2: Regression results for three-way interaction outcomes.
| Variable | OCB-I |
I-Dev |
Turnover intentions |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | t | p | B | SE | t | p | B | SE | t | p | |
| Constant | 3.51 | 0.69 | 5.06 | 0.00 | 1.35 | 0.55 | 2.45 | 0.02 | 3.06 | 1.15 | 2.67 | 0.01 |
| Status | 1.00 | 0.32 | 3.15 | 0.02 | –0.20 | 0.25 | –0.81 | 0.42 | 0.12 | 0.46 | 0.27 | 0.79 |
| Ostracism | –0.78 | 0.28 | 2.73 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 1.33 | 0.18 | –0.38 | 0.52 | –0.72 | 0.47 |
| Status × Ostracism | –0.49 | 0.13 | –3.87 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 2.12 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 2.08 | 0.87 | 0.38 |
| Support | –0.85 | 1.56 | –0.54 | 0.59 | 2.56 | 1.24 | 2.01 | 0.04 | –5.08 | 2.49 | –2.04 | 0.04 |
| Ostracism × Support | 2.03 | 1.01 | 2.00 | 0.05 | –2.41 | 0.81 | –2.98 | 0.01 | 2.26 | 1.23 | 2.01 | 0.04 |
| Status × Support | 0.86 | 0.70 | 1.23 | 0.22 | –1.46 | 0.55 | –2.63 | 0.01 | 2.21 | 1.62 | 1.36 | 0.18 |
| Ostracism × Status × Support | –1.20 | 0.45 | –2.70 | 0.01 | 1.29 | 0.35 | 3.63 | 0.00 | –0.95 | 0.72 | –1.32 | 0.19 |
N = 232. Status, hierarchical status of ostracizer; Support, perceived external support.