Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 7;5:e3788. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3788

Figure 2. A comparison of per-read CRISPR detection strategies (A) between MetaCRAST and existing de novo detection tools (e.g., Crass, MinCED) and an outline of the MetaCRAST workflow (B).

Figure 2

DR represents direct repeat, while S represents spacer.