Skip to main content
. 2001 Sep 22;323(7314):658. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7314.658

Table 2.

Mean (SD) scores for key voice and psychological variables at each visit for treatment and no treatment groups (patients with complete data)

Test or questionnaire Treatment
No treatment
F value Treatment effect (points (95% CI))
No of patients Visit 1 (baseline) Visit 2 or 3 No of patients Visit 1 (baseline) Visit 2 or 3
At completion of treatment (visit 2)
 Psychological distress:
 HADS anxiety 67 6.3 (4.0) 5.9 (4.5) 63 8.1 (4.3) 7.7 (3.9) 0.71 (P=0.402) 0.39 (−0.53 to 1.31)
 HADS depression 67 3.7 (3.5) 3.6 (3.7) 63 4.2 (3.3) 4.2 (3.1) 0.38 (P=0.540) 0.25 (−0.55 to 1.05)
 CIS total score 67 7.0 (6.9) 62 8.6 (8.2)
Voice:
 Buffalo overall rating* 74 2.9 (1.1)  2.3 (0.93) 69 2.9 (1.0)  2.5 (0.93) 2.33 (P=0.130) 0.21 (−0.01 to 0.49)
 Pitch perturbation 67 3.2 (2.4) 2.8 (1.5) 57 2.4 (1.4) 2.8 (1.5) 0.97 (P=0.326) 0.25 (−0.25 to 0.74)
 Amplitude perturbation 67 6.0 (4.2) 4.5 (2.6) 57 5.0 (3.3) 5.7 (3.8) 8.03 (P=0.005) 1.6 (0.47 to 2.63)
 VPQ total 67 27.6 (8.0) 22.4 (5.8) 65 27.9 (7.5) 25.4 (8.1) 6.12 (P=0.015) 2.6 (0.51 to 4.63)
At completion of follow up (visit 3)
 Psychological distress:
 HADS anxiety 62 6.6 (4.0) 5.9 (3.8) 56 8.1 (4.0) 6.7 (4.1) 0.00 (P=0.969) 0.02 (−1.21 to 1.25)
 HADS depression 62 4.2 (3.6) 3.8 (3.5) 56 4.2 (3.3) 4.3 (3.6) 1.08 (P=0.300) 0.4 (−1.3 to 0.39)
 CIS total score 67 7.0 (6.9) 7.3 (8.1) 62 8.6 (8.2) 7.6 (8.8) 0.64 (P=0.424) 0.89 (−1.3 to 3.06)
Voice:
 Buffalo overall rating* 70 2.9 (1.1) 2.2 (1.0) 63 2.8 (1.0) 3.0 (1.0) 26.50 (P<0.001) 0.82 (0.5 to 1.13)
 Pitch perturbation 65 3.1 (2.4) 2.7 (1.5) 54 2.4 (1.4) 2.2 (1.5) 1.58 (P=0.212) 0.35 (−0.20 to 0.89)
 Amplitude perturbation 65 5.8 (3.9) 4.1 (3.0) 54 5.1 (3.2) 4.5 (3.6) 0.90 (P=0.345) 0.57 (−0.62 to 1.77)
 Score on VPQ 61 28.8 (8.2) 21.6 (6.3) 57 28.0 (7.5) 25.4 (8.5) 10.96 (P=0.001) 4.14 (1.67 to 6.61) 

HADS=hospital anxiety and depression scale; CIS=clinical interview schedule; VPQ=vocal performance questionnaire. 

*

Buffalo voice profile analysis has an “overall rating” as 1 of 10 items scored 0-5. 

The higher the score the more dysphonic the voice. 

Maximum score=60; the higher the score the more dysphonic the voice.