Skip to main content
. 2001 Sep 22;323(7314):658. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7314.658

Table 4.

Mean (SD) scores for key voice and psychological variables at each visit for treatment and no treatment groups (all patients with baseline data)

Test or questionnaire Treatment
No treatment
Sensitivity score (F value) Treatment effect (points (95% CI))
No of patients Visit 1 (baseline) Visit 2 or 3 No of patients Visit 1 (baseline) Visit 2 or 3
At completion of treatment (visit 2)
 Psychological distress:
 HADS anxiety 85 6.5 (4.2) 6.2 (4.4) 80 8.2 (4.2) 7.9 (4.0) 0.67 (P=0.416) 0.30 (−0.43 to 1.04)
 HADS depression 85 4.1 (3.5) 4.0 (3.7) 80 4.6 (3.6) 4.5 (3.4) 0.30 (P=0.584) 0.17 (−0.46 to 0.81)
 CIS total score 99 7.6 (7.5) 103 9.2 (9.3)
Voice:
 Buffalo overall rating* 100 2.9 (1.0) 2.4 (1.0) 103 3.0 (1.0) 2.7 (1.0) 5.0 (P=0.03) 0.25 (0.003 to 0.47)
 Pitch perturbation 97 3.1 (2.2) 2.8 (1.6) 92 2.9 (2.2) 3.1 (2.2)  5.7 (P=0.018) 0.46 (0.008 to 0.84)
 Amplitude perturbation 97 6.1 (4.3) 5.1 (3.5) 92 6.1 (5.3) 6.5 (5.5) 11.9 (P=0.001) 1.5 (0.64 to 2.3)
 VPQ total 85 28.4 (9.0) 24.2 (8.3) 81 29.4 (8.9) 26.9 (9.5)  3.9 (P=0.051)  1.9 (−0.001 to 3.8)
At completion of follow up (visit 3)
 Psychological distress:
 HADS anxiety 85 6.5 (4.2) 6.0 (3.9) 80 8.2 (4.2) 7.2 (4.3) 0.018 (P=0.893) 0.006 (−0.88 to 1.01)
 HADS depression 85 4.1 (3.5) 3.8 (3.4) 80 4.6 (3.6) 4.6 (3.8) 1.51 (P=0.221) 0.37 (−0.23 to 0.98)
 CIS total score 99 7.6 (7.5) 7.6 (8.2) 103 9.2 (9.3) 8.6 (9.7) 0.63 (P=0.428) 0.58 (−2.01 to 0.86)
Voice:
 Buffalo overall rating* 100 2.9 (1.0) 2.4 (1.0) 103 3.0 (1.0) 3.1 (1.0) 29.80 (P=0.000) 0.62 (0.40 to 0.85)
 Pitch perturbation 97 3.1 (2.2) 2.8 (1.6) 92 2.9 (2.2) 2.8 (2.3) 0.140 (P=0.709) 0.008 (−0.35 to 0.51)
 Amplitude perturbation 97 6.1 (4.3) 5.0 (4.0) 92 6.1 (5.3) 5.8 (5.6)  2.8 (P=0.096) 0.80 (−0.14 to 1.7)
 Score on VPQ 85 28.4 (9.0) 23.3 (8.3) 81 29.4 (8.9) 27.7 (9.9) 12.32 (P=0.001) 3.69 (1.61 to 5.76) 

HADS=hospital anxiety and depression scale; CIS=clinical interview schedule; VPQ=vocal performance questionnaire. 

*

Buffalo voice profile analysis has an “overall rating” as 1 of 10 items scored 0-5. 

The higher the score the more dysphonic the voice. 

Maximum score=60; the higher the score the more dysphonic the voice.