Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 14;121(35):8211–8241. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b03441

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Considering the simplest bimodal model with two discrete distances, the distance resolution of time-resolved fluorescence measurements is limited by the shot noise of the experiment. Statistical error estimates of a two-distance model described by eq 56 with distances Inline graphic and Inline graphic, fluorescence lifetime τD(0) = 4 ns, and a time-window of 12.5τD(0). (A) Relative standard error δ per 106 photons of the distances Inline graphic (blue, left), Inline graphic (green, middle), and their difference ΔRDA (red, right). White lines are isolines δ = 0.5 (also shown at panel D). (B) Isolines of δ(Inline graphic)) = 0.5 (blue line), δ(Inline graphic) = 0.5 (green line), and δ(ΔRDA)=0.5 (red line) for 106 counted photons (the same as white lines at panel A). The isolines partition the parameter space in four regions: (i) All three parameters are resolved. (ii) The distances Inline graphic, Inline graphic can be reliably determined while the relative standard error of their difference δ(ΔRDA) increases above value 0.5. (iii) Only the shorter distance Inline graphic is reliably estimated. The distance distribution is only partially resolved, and the species with small FRET rate constant cannot be distinguished from non-FRET species. (iv) None of the parameters is resolved. The vertical lines indicate limiting distances Inline graphic of the region i (red) and Inline graphic of the region ii (green). (C) Dependence of the limiting distances Inline graphic and Inline graphic on the number of detected photons.