Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Infect Dis. 2013 Sep 13;17(12):e1154–e1159. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.08.006

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study populations of the two treatment groups

Variables at baseline Patients on EFV-based regimen (n = 104) Patients on NVP-based regimen (n = 64) p-Value
Age (years) 35 (6.9) 38 (1.7) 0.06
Weight (kg) 41.9 (7.9) 43 (7.7) 0.89
Male gender 81 (78%) 51 (80%) 0.78
Alcohol consumption (often) 43 (41%) 31 (48%) 0.14
CD4 count (cells/mm3) 90 (53–130) 75 (34–130) 0.14
Viral load (copies/ml) 259 000 (81 200–531 000) 203 000 (87 900–370 000) 0.79
AST (U/l) 43 (29–65) 47 (29–52) 0.93
ALT (U/l) 26 (16–42) 31 (19–41) 0.94
SAP (U/l) 127 (91–232) 211 (74–260) 0.78
Serum bilirubin (mg/dl) 0.4 (0.3–0.5) 0.4 (0.3–0.5) 0.26

EFV, efavirenz; NVP, nevirapine; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; SAP, serum alkaline phosphatase; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range.

a

Results are mean (SD), n (%), or median (IQR). Comparison between groups: t-test for means, and Wilcoxon signed rank test for medians.