Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 6;7(9):2931–2943. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.044024

Table 4. Performances of the SVM models during 10-fold cross-validation using LOTOCV method.

No. of ASP-siRNAs Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) During 10nCV and IV
S. No. Gene Name Training Dataset Validation Dataset 10nCV IV
1 APP 907 15 0.71 0.88
2 AR 912 10 0.71 0.19
3 COL1A1 912 10 0.71 0.49
4 COL3A1 903 19 0.71 0.34
5 COL6A3 911 11 0.70 0.24
6 COL7A1 903 19 0.71 0.55
7 HTT 883 39 0.56 0.28
8 KRAS 844 78 0.68 0.31
9 KRT12 884 38 0.71 0.48
10 KRT5 884 38 0.71 0.24
11 KRT6a 903 19 0.70 0.31
12 KRT9 830 92 0.63 0.26
13 LRRK2 901 21 0.71 0.26
14 Others 844 78 0.74 0.20
15 P. Luciferase 865 57 0.71 0.23
16 PPIB 695 227 0.53 0.61
17 PRNP 904 18 0.71 0.79
18 PSEN1 903 19 0.43 0.30
19 SNCA 906 16 0.71 0.50
20 SOD1 881 41 0.53 0.34
21 TGFBI 903 19 0.55 0.64
22 TP63 884 38 0.58 0.33

ASP-siRNAs targeting a particular gene are assigned to the validation dataset, while sequences from other genes were assigned to the training set. Validation of the models was done using respective gene in the independent validation set. Standard HGNC gene symbols have been used. PCC is between the actual and observed Effmut. The training dataset is used to train different predictive models, while independent validation datasets were not used in any training algorithms. S.No., Serial number; 10nCV, ten-fold cross-validation; IV, independent validation.