Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 26;7(9):3059–3071. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.1137

Table 6. Concordance of phenotypic and susceptibility results for all three organisms (64 isolates).

Pheno: S Pheno: R
Class Antibiotic Geno:R Geno:S Geno:R Geno:S Discordant (%) Concordant (%) P-Value
β-Lactam Ampicillin 4 42 15 3 11 89 0.73
β-Lactam Ceftiofur 19 44 0 1 31 69 <0.001
β-Lactam Penicillin 4 41 15 4 13 88 0.99
Tetracycline Chlortetracycline 53 1 10 0 83 17 <0.001
Tetracycline Oxytetracycline 1 1 62 0 2 98 0.50
Fluoroquinolone Danofloxacin 0 44 0 20 31 69 <0.001
Fluoroquinolone Enrofloxacin 0 64 0 0 0 100 0.32
Phenicol Florfenicol 24 26 14 0 38 63 <0.001
Aminoglycoside Gentamicin 0 52 0 12 19 81 0.002
Aminoglycoside Neomycin 0 0 63 1 2 98 1.0
Aminoglycoside Spectinomycin 0 64 0 0 0 100 0.37
Sulfonamide Sulfadimethoxine 1 1 60 2 5 95 0.63
Trimeth/Sulf TMS 33 21 7 3 56 44 <0.001
Pleuromutilin Tiamulin 0 40 0 24 37 63 <0.001
MLS Clindamycin 7 6 31 20 42 58 0.02
MLS Tilmicosin 13 21 25 5 28 72 0.06
MLS Tulathromycin 33 26 7 3 52 48 <0.001
MLS Tylosin tartrate 5 4 33 22 42 58 <0.001

Pheno, phenotype; S, susceptible; R, resistant; Geno, genotype; Trimeth/Sulf, trimethoprim/sulfonamide; TMS, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; MLS, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin.