Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Cutan Pathol. 2016 Jul 1;43(10):830–837. doi: 10.1111/cup.12751

Table 3.

Level of agreement and types of disagreements from independent review according to MPATH-Dx lexicon (n = 239)

Reference consensus diagnosis
Nevus/mild atypia (n = 25) Moderate atypia (n = 35) Severe atypia/melanoma in situ (n = 60) T1a melanoma (n = 58) T1b melanoma (n = 61)
All three pathologists agreed – n = 115, n (%) 14 (56.0%) 5 (14.3%) 27(45.0%) 23 (39.7%) 46 (75.4%)
The three pathologists did not agree – n = 124, n (%) 11 (44.0%)* 30 (85.7%) 33 (55.0%) 35 (60.3%)§ 15 (24.6%)||
Types of disagreement
 Different terms/nomenclature 1 0 1 0 1
 Threshold differences 8 27 24 18 3
 Missed finding 0 1 2 10 6
 Contents on slides differ 2 2 4 8 7
 Philosophical/conceptual differences 2 3 8 4 0

MPATH-Dx, Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis.

*

One case had more than 1 type of disagreement.

Three cases had more than 1 type of disagreement.

Seven cases had more than 1 type of disagreement.

§

Four cases had more than 1 type of disagreement.

||

Two cases had more than 1 type of disagreement.