Table 3.
Reference consensus diagnosis
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nevus/mild atypia (n = 25) | Moderate atypia (n = 35) | Severe atypia/melanoma in situ (n = 60) | T1a melanoma (n = 58) | T1b melanoma (n = 61) | |
All three pathologists agreed – n = 115, n (%) | 14 (56.0%) | 5 (14.3%) | 27(45.0%) | 23 (39.7%) | 46 (75.4%) |
The three pathologists did not agree – n = 124, n (%) | 11 (44.0%)* | 30 (85.7%)† | 33 (55.0%)‡ | 35 (60.3%)§ | 15 (24.6%)|| |
Types of disagreement | |||||
Different terms/nomenclature | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Threshold differences | 8 | 27 | 24 | 18 | 3 |
Missed finding | 0 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 |
Contents on slides differ | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 7 |
Philosophical/conceptual differences | 2 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
MPATH-Dx, Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis.
One case had more than 1 type of disagreement.
Three cases had more than 1 type of disagreement.
Seven cases had more than 1 type of disagreement.
Four cases had more than 1 type of disagreement.
Two cases had more than 1 type of disagreement.