Skip to main content
. 2017 May 7;8(34):57755–57765. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17645

Table 2. Association between aberrant levels of lncRNAs and characteristics of patients with PCa.

Characteristics Studies Case number Pooled OR (95% CI) P Heterogeneity Model References
I2 P
Age (≤ 65 vs > 65 years old) 3 468 1.16 [0.45, 2.96] 0.76 19% 0.29 Random [20, 22, 29]
Lymph node metastasis 8 1971 0.83 [0.48, 1.43] 0.50 64% 0.005 Random [1722, 29, 31]
Margin status 5 1478 1.15 [0.66, 2.02] 0.62 71% 0.007 Random [17, 18, 21, 29, 31]
Preoperative PSA (≤ 10 vs > 10 ng/ml) 3 1011 1.12 [0.23, 5.37] 0.89 89% 0.0001 Random [17, 18, 21]
SVI 2 1070 2.66 [0.21, 33.15] 0.46 89% 0.003 Random [17, 31]
ECE/EPE 2 1067 1.30 [0.49, 3.45] 0.60 81% 0.02 Random [17, 31]
Biochemical recurrence 3 491 2.06 [0.56, 7.57] 0.27 81% 0.005 Random [19, 21, 31]
Distance Metastasis* 2 177 4.55 [2.26, 9.15] < 0.0001 0% 0.86 Fixed [20, 22]
Capsule invasion 2 177 1.36 [0.74, 2.50] 0.32 0% 0.47 Fixed [20, 22]
Multiple lesions 3 334 0.95 [0.57, 1.58] 0.85 0% 0.82 Fixed [20, 22, 31]
Tumor diameter (≤ 2.5vs > 2.5 cm)* 2 177 0.52 [0.28, 0.95] 0.03 0% 0.95 Fixed [20, 22]
Gleason Score (< 7 vs ≥ 7) 8 2678 1.12 [0.54, 2.32] 0.75 82% < 0.00001 Random [17, 18, 2022, 27, 29, 31]
Tumor stage (T2 vs T3-T4) 5 1536 0.88 [0.34, 2.29] 0.79 88% < 0.00001 Random [18, 20, 22, 27, 29]
Pathological stage (I + II vs III + IV) 3 1248 2.17 [0.88, 5.37] 0.09 85% 0.001 Random [19, 21, 27]
Histological grade (II vs III + IV)* 2 177 6.23 [3.29, 11.82] < 0.00001 0% 0.81 Fixed [20, 22]

SVI = seminal vesical involvement; ECE = extra capsular extension; EPE = extra prostatic extension. “*” means P < 0.05.