Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychol. 2017 May 3;127:148–156. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.05.003

Table 2.

Descriptive Statistics for Threat Bias, ERP Amplitudes (μV), and Cortisol

Pre-Assessment
ABMT
PT
Post-Assessment
ABMT
PT
M SD M SD M SD M SD
Attention Bias 0.87 25.98 2.71 25.23 −3.40 19.27 6.79 12.30
Vigilance −3.93 25.68 2.86 −13.57 −3.07 15.35 2.64 9.51
Disengagement 4.80 24.62 0.14 20.26 −0.33 16.54 4.14 −14.11
P1 0.20 0.64 0.15 0.92 0.00 0.77 0.08 0.99
N170 0.07 1.00 −0.05 1.34 0.07 1.04 −0.04 1.21
P2 −0.14 1.12 −0.17 1.37 0.23 0.94 −0.25 1.43
N2 0.06 0.90 0.29 1.23 0.31 0.95 −0.22 1.07
AUCI [home Day 4; min × (μg/dl) −1.79 2.20 −1.15 2.50
Cortisol Reactivity (Lab; μg/dl) −0.05 0.09 0.01 0.09
AUCI [Lab; min × (μg/dl)] −0.03 0.05 0.02 0.09

ABMT = Attention bias modification training; PT = placebo training. ERP amplitudes are the difference between the Threat-Neutral and Neutral-Neutral condition. AUCI = area under the curve with respect to increase.

1

If participants did not own a personal iOS device, one was provided.