Table 3.
Reference | Random Sequence Generation (Selection Bias) | Allocation Concealment (Selection Bias) | Blinding of Participants and Personnel (Performance Bias) | Blinding of Outcome Assessment (Detection Bias) | Incomplete Outcome Data (Attrition Bias) | Selective Reporting (Reporting Bias) | Other Bias | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dewar et al. 2014 | U | H | U | H | No details on randomization procedures | |||
Haug et al. 2013a | H | |||||||
Huang, Dillon 2014 | U | U | H | U | L | L | H | Tailored TM & phone counseling not described; effect of mobile component unknown |
Huang Terrones 2014 | L | L | H | L | L | L | H | Tailored TM & phone counseling not described; effect of mobile component unknown |
Lana et al. 2013 | U | U | H | U | H | L | L | No details on randomization procedures |
Love-Osborne et al. | H | H | H | H | L | L | H | No details on randomization procedures; authors noted several confounders in both groups |
Nguyen et al. | U | U | U | H | H | L | H | No details on randomization procedures; no true control group |
Seid et al. | H | H | L | L | L | L | U | |
Shi et al. | U | U | U | U | H | L | H | Potential recruitment bias with cluster randomization |
Skov-Ettrup et al. | U | U | L | U | H | L | H | >60% attrition in both intervention groups; design does not allow conclusion of whether effect caused by tailoring or TM frequency |
Legend: H = high risk of bias; L = low risk of bias; U = unclear bias; TM = text messaging