Table 5.
Meta-Analytic Results of Between-Group Sexual Threat–Related Bias for Sexually Victimized Versus Nonsexually Victimized Participants (k = 11 Outcomes).
| Study | n | g | 95% CI | p | FV | RP | VS | G | Age | P | Pub |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bush (1999) | 122 | .00 | [−0.35, 0.35] | 1.00 | — | — | — | 1 | 21.66 | 2 | 1 |
| Cassiday et al. (1992) | 26 | .86 | [0.15, 1.57] | .02 | — | — | 2 | 9 | 32.89 | 1 | 2 |
| Freeman and Beck (2000) | 53 | .48 | [−0.08, 1.03] | .09 | |||||||
| Garcia (2006) | 58 | .08 | [−0.45, 0.61] | .77 | — | — | — | 1 | 18.79 | 1 | 1 |
| Klewchuk et al. (2007) | 53 | .63 | [0.08, 1.19] | .03 | — | — | — | 9 | 40.30 | 1 | 2 |
| Lambourn-Kavcic (1998) | 33 | .75 | [0.05, 1.46] | .04 | — | — | 2 | 1 | 33.06 | 1 | 1 |
| Martinson et al. (2013) | 101 | .36 | [−0.05, 0.77] | .09 | — | — | — | 9 | 21.01 | 1 | 2 |
| McNally et al. (2000) | 27 | .21 | [−0.52, 0.95] | .57 | — | — | — | 1 | 42.73 | 1 | 2 |
| Patriquin et al. (2012) | 123 | .15 | [−0.27, 0.56] | .49 | — | — | — | 1 | 18.84 | 1 | 2 |
| Sawhney (2002) | 65 | .07 | [−0.45, 0.58] | .89 | — | — | 2 | 1 | 36.12 | 1 | 1 |
| Waller and Ruddock (1995) | 67 | .61 | [0.01, 1.22] | .05 | — | — | — | 1 | 24.70 | 1 | 2 |
Note. n = number of participants in subsample; g = Hedge’s g (effect size); CI = confidence interval; p = p value; FV = age first victimized; RP = relationship to perpetrator; VS = victimization severity; G = gender of sample; Age = mean age of sample; P = paradigm; Pub = publication type. Dashes indicate that moderator variable could not be computed.