Table 6.
Study | n | g | 95% CI | p | FV | RP | VS | G | Age | P | Pub |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bremner et al. (2004) | 21 | .00 | [−0.83, 0.83] | 1.00 | — | — | — | 1 | 36.14 | 2 | 1 |
Cassiday et al. (1992) | 24 | 1.05 | [0.22, 1.88] | .01 | — | — | 2 | 9 | 32.17 | 1 | 2 |
Foa et al. (1991) | 28 | .63 | [−0.11, 1.34] | .10 | — | — | — | 1 | 29.77 | 1 | 2 |
Freeman and Beck (2000) | 33 | .04 | [−0.64, 0.72] | .90 | — | — | — | 1 | 13.98 | 1 | 2 |
Garcia (2006) | 37 | .16 | [−0.49, 0.82] | .63 | — | — | — | 1 | 18.68 | 1 | 1 |
Martinson et al. (2013) | 66 | .27 | [−0.21, 0.75] | .27 | — | — | — | 9 | 21.97 | 1 | 2 |
Sawhney (2002) | 44 | .12 | [−0.46, 0.70] | .70 | — | — | 2 | 1 | 35.63 | 1 | 1 |
Note. n = number of participants in subsample; g = Hedge’s g (effect size); CI = confidence interval; p = p value; FV = age first victimized; RP = relationship to perpetrator; VS = victimization severity; G = gender of sample; Age = mean age of sample; P = paradigm; Pub = publication type. Dashes indicate that moderator variable could not be computed.