Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 1;24(10):3093–3106. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5940-1

Table 2.

Hierarchy of quality domains for breast surgeons after the 3rd round of modified Delphi ranking

Quality domain Median scorea Validityb Agreementc
Patients receiving diagnosis of cancer by needle biopsy 9 Yes Agreement
Patients undergoing a formal patient-side-site-procedure verification procedure in the operating room 9 No Agreement
Percentage of cancer patients with orientation of lumpectomy specimen 9 Yes Agreement
Clinical stages 1 and 2 node-negative patients offered sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery 9 Yes Agreement
Mastectomy patients with ≥4 positive nodes referred to radiation oncologist 9 Yes Agreement
Stages 1, 2, and 3 patients undergoing initial breast cancer surgery with documentation of ER, PR receptor status 9 No Agreement
Stage 1, 2, and 3 undergoing initial breast cancer surgery with documentation of HER2 neu status 9 No Agreement
Breast conservation therapy (BCT) patients referred to radiation oncology 9 Yes Agreement
Percentage of patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy before planned breast conservation surgery (BCS) who have imaging marker clip placed in breast 9 Yes Agreement
Percentage of patients undergoing lumpectomy for non-palpable cancer with specimen imaging performed 9 Yes Agreement
Patients with concordance assessment (testing) of Exam-Imaging-Path by care provider 9 No Agreement
Patients undergoing breast cancer surgery with final path report indicating largest single tumor size 8.5 No Agreement
Patient’s compliant with National Quality Forum Quality Measures (NQF QM) for endocrine therapy in hormonal receptor positive patients 8.5 Yes Agreement
Trastuzumab is considered or administered within 4 months (120 days) after diagnosis for stage 1, 2, or 3 breast cancer that is HER2-positive 8.5 No Agreement
Documentation of mastectomy patients offered referral to plastic surgery 8.5 Yes Agreement
Documentation of eligibility of BCT and eligible patients offered BCT 8.5 Yes Agreement
Patients with documentation of patient options for treatment regardless of procedure type 8.5 Yes Agreement
Percentage of patients undergoing BCT with a final ink-negative margin, regardless of number of operations 8.5 No Agreement
Patients with adequate history by care provider 8 No Agreement
Patients with documentation of postoperative cancer staging (AJCC) 8 Yes Agreement
Patient’s compliant with NQF QM for radiation after lumpectomy 8 No Agreement
Patients with documentation preoperative (pretreatment) AJCC clinical staging 8 Yes Agreement
NCCN compliance with radiation guidelines 8 No Agreement
Mastectomy patients receiving preoperative antibiotics 8 Yes Agreement
Patients with NCCN guideline compliant care for “high risk lesions” identified on needle biopsy (ADH, ALH, FEA, LCIS, papillary lesion, radial scar, mucin-containing lesion) 8 No Agreement
Patients with NCCN guidelines compliant care for diagnostic evaluation of breast lump 8 No Agreement
Patients with NCCN compliance for postoperative lab imaging, biomarkers in stages 0, 1, and 2 patients 8 No Agreement
NCCN guideline compliance for genetic testing among patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer 8 No Agreement
NCCN guideline compliance for genetics assessment/referral among patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer 8 No Agreement
Patients with adequate examination by care provider 7.5 No Agreement
Patients with final pathologic size ≥ stage 1 T1cN0M0 who have documentation of discussion regarding adjuvant treatment 7.5 Yes Agreement
Documentation of reason why patient is not eligible for BCT 7.5 No Indeterminant
Patients with adequate review of imagining by care provider 7.5 No Indeterminant
Patients with inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer who undergo neoadjuvant treatment before surgery 7.5 No Agreement
High-risk patients with estimated lifetime risk >20% offered screening MRI 7.5 No Indeterminant
NCCN compliance for medical oncology recommendations 7.5 No Indeterminant
Risk adjusted re-excision lumpectomy rate after breast-conserving therapy 7.5 Yes Agreement
NCCN guideline compliance for inflammatory breast cancer 7.5 No Indeterminant
NCCN guideline compliance for breast cancer in pregnancy 7.5 No Indeterminant
Patients with predicted estimate of BRCA mutation >10% offered BRCA testing 7.5 No Indeterminant
High-risk patients (no known cancer) with documentation of risk-reduction counseling 7.5 No Indeterminant
NCCN guideline compliance for inadequate margins requiring re-excision in BCS patients 7.5 No Agreement
Patients receiving antibiotics within 1 h before surgery 7 Yes Agreement
Patients receiving a first- or second-generation cephalosporin before incision 7 Yes Agreement
Patients with discontinuations of antibiotics within 24 h after surgery 7 Yes Agreement
Patients with Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) antibiotic measure compliance (includes all 3 measures above) 7 Yes Agreement
Patients with breast cancer with documentation of risk assessment for germline mutation 7 No Indeterminant
Patients compliant with SCIP DVT/PE prophylaxis recommendations 7 No Indeterminant
Patients ≤50 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer offered genetic testing 7 Yes Agreement
Patients presented to interdisciplinary tumor board (real or virtual) at any time 7 No Agreement
Patients compliant with NQF QM for chemotherapy in hormonal receptor-negative patients 7 No Indeterminant
Surgical-site infection rate (mastectomy patients) 7 No Indeterminant
Percentage of patients entered into a patient registry to identify patient complications and cancer outcomes 7 No Indeterminant
One-step surgery success rate stratified by type of operation (mastectomy) 7 No Indeterminant
Sentinel lymph node identification rate (%) in breast cancer surgery 7 Yes Agreement
Cosmetic score (measure of cosmesis) after BCS (patient self-assessment with Harvard score) 7 No Indeterminant
Time (business days) from diagnostic evaluation to needle biopsy 7 No Indeterminant
Time (business days) from needle biopsy path report to surgical appointment 7 No Indeterminant
Surgical-site infection rate (mastectomy plus plastic surgery patients) 7 No Indeterminant
Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) 7 No Indeterminant
Percentage of patients undergoing lumpectomy for non-palpable cancer with two-view specimen imaging performed 7 No Indeterminant
Percentage of compliance with ASBrS or ACR annotation of ultrasound (US) images 7 No Indeterminant
Percentage of compliance with ASBrS or ACR recommendations for US reports 7 No Indeterminant
Percentage of compliance with ASBrS or ACR recommendations for US needle biopsy reports 7 No Indeterminant
Compliance with ASBrS or ACR recommendations for US needle biopsy reports 7 No Indeterminant
NCCN guideline compliance for pre-op lab and imaging in clinical stages 0, 1, and 2 patients with cancer 7 No Indeterminant
Patients with preoperative needle biopsy proven axillary node who do not undergo sentinel node procedure 7 No Indeterminant
Local regional recurrence 7 No Indeterminant
Patients age ≥70 years, hormone receptor positive, with invasive cancer offered endocrine therapy instead of radiation (documentation) 7 No Indeterminant
Disease-free survival 6.5 No Indeterminant
Time business days from new breast cancer to office appointment 6.5 No Indeterminant
Patients with predicted estimate of BRCA mutation >10% who are tested 6.5 No Indeterminant
Time business days from needle biopsy path report of cancer to surgical operation 6.5 No Indeterminant
Time business days from abnormal screening mammography to diagnostic evaluation 6.5 No Indeterminant
Percentage of cancer patients entered into a quality audit (any type: institutional, personal case log, regional, national) 6.5 No Indeterminant
Time business days from new breast symptom to office appointment 6.5 No Indeterminant
Patients with benign breast disease with documentation of risk assessment for cancer 6.5 No Indeterminant
Percentage of patients with partial breast irradiation after lumpectomy who are compliant with “ASBrS guidelines for eligibility” 6.5 No Indeterminant
Percentage of patients with partial breast irradiation after lumpectomy who are compliant with “ASTRO guidelines for eligibility” 6.5 No Indeterminant
Number of breast-specific CMEs per year 6.5 No Indeterminant
NCCN compliance for SLN surgery in stage 0 DCIS 6.5 No Indeterminant
Skin flap necrosis rate after mastectomy stratified by type of mastectomy reconstruction, type of reconstruction 6.5 No Indeterminant
Overall survival 6 No Indeterminant
Ratio of malignant-to-benign minimally invasive breast biopsies 6 No Indeterminant
Surgical-site infection rate (all patients) 6 No Indeterminant
Surgeon US (2 × 2 test table performance) (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) for surgeons performing diagnostic breast evaluation with imaging 6 No Indeterminant
NCCN guideline compliance for phyllodes tumor 6 No Indeterminant
Compliance with ASBrS or ACR recommendations for stereotactic biopsy reports 6 No Indeterminant
Time business days from surgeon appointment for cancer to surgery for cancer 6 No Indeterminant
Percentage of mastectomy patients undergoing reconstruction 6 No Indeterminant
Cost of perioperative episode of care (affordability) 6 No Agreement
Patients with cancer diagnosed for core needle biopsy (CNB) for BiRads 4a lesion 6 No Indeterminant
Patients with cancer diagnosed for CNB for BiRads 4b lesion 6 No Indeterminant
Patients with cancer diagnosed for CNB for BiRads 4c lesion 6 No Indeterminant
Patients with cancer diagnosed for CNB for BiRads 5 lesion 6 No Indeterminant
NCCN guideline compliance for Paget’s disease 6 No Indeterminant
Surgical-site infection rate (BCS patients) 6 No Indeterminant
Number of axillary nodes obtained in patients undergoing level 1 or 2 nodal surgery (median) 6 No Indeterminant
Percentage of DCIS patients undergoing BCS for cancer who do not have axillary surgery 6 No Indeterminant
Patients with College of American Pathologists (CAP) compliant reporting 5.5 No Indeterminant
Breast cancer patients presented to interdisciplinary tumor board (real or virtual) before 1st treatment 5.5 No Indeterminant
Percentage of cancer patients enrolled in clinical trials 5.5 No Indeterminant
Mastectomy patients with positive SLN who undergo completion of axillary dissection 5.5 No Indeterminant
Patients with cancer diagnosed on CNB for BiRads 3 lesion 5.5 No Indeterminant
Patients with unifocal cancer smaller than 3 cm who undergo BCT 5.5 No Indeterminant
Patients with documentation of pre-op breast size and symmetry 5.5 No Indeterminant
Clinical stage 0 DCIS patients who do not undergo SLN surgery for BCT 5.5 No Indeterminant
Patients undergoing level 1 or 2 axillary dissection with ≥15 nodes removed 5.5 No Indeterminant
Number of SLN’s (median) in patients undergoing SLN procedure 5.5 No Indeterminant
Breast volume (number of cancer cases per year per surgeon) 5.5 No Indeterminant
Percentage of cancer patients with documentation of search for clinical trial 5.5 No Indeterminant
Percentage of breast biopsy pathology requisition forms containing adequate information for pathologist (history, CBE, imaging) 5 No Agreement
Time from initial cancer surgery to pathology report 5 No Indeterminant
Patients with documentation of pre-op contralateral breast cancer risk 5 No Indeterminant
Clinical stage 0 DCIS patients who do not undergo SLN surgery for mastectomy 5 No Indeterminant
BCT rate (actual and potential) 5 No Indeterminant
Time business days from abnormal screening mammogram (SM) to office appointment 5 No Indeterminant
Patients with documentation of needle biopsy results delivered to patients within 48 h 5 No Indeterminant
BCT-eligible patients offered neoadjuvant treatment 5 No Agreement
Interval cancers (cancer detected within 1 year after negative US biopsy or stereotactic biopsy) 5 No Indeterminant
Cosmetic score (measure of cosmesis) after mastectomy, no reconstruction (patient self-assessment) 5 No Indeterminant
Percentage of cancer patients referred to medical oncology 5 No Indeterminant
Axillary recurrence rate 5 No Indeterminant
Patients with NCCN guidelines compliant care for nipple discharge 5 No Disagreement
Percentage of BCT patients with marker clips placed in lumpectomy cavity to aid radiation oncologist for location of boost dose for radiation 5 No Indeterminant
Percentage of patients with documentation of arm edema status post-operatively 4.5 No Indeterminant
Patients undergoing re-operation within 30 days (stratified by case type) 4.5 No Indeterminant
Patients undergoing re-admission within 30 days (stratified by base type) 4.5 No Indeterminant
Percentage of BCT patients with oncoplastic procedure performed 4.5 No Indeterminant
Patients with documentation of gynecologic/sexual side effects of endocrine therapy 4.5 No Indeterminant
Patients with documentation of gynecologic/sexual changes during follow-up 4.5 No Indeterminant
Mastectomy patients who undergo immediate intraoperative SLN assessment 4.5 No Indeterminant
Patients with latragenic injury to adjacent organ, structure (stratified by case type) 4 No Indeterminant
Percentage of lumpectomy patients with surgeon use of US intraoperatively 4 No Indeterminant
Patients with documentation of surgical pathology results delivered to patients within 96 h 4 No Indeterminant
Patients who have “grouped” postoperative appointments (same day, same location with care providers) 4 No Indeterminant
Percutaneous procedure complications 3.5 No Indeterminant
Percentage of patients with development of lymphedema of arm after axillary surgery 3.5 No Indeterminant
Time from initial cancer surgery to pathology report 3 No Disagreement
Patients with new DVT less than or equal to 30 days post-operatively 3 No Disagreement
Patients with new PE ≤30 days post-operatively 3 No Indeterminant
Documentation of use of new NSQIP-generated ACS risk calculator preoperatively 3 No Indeterminant
Patients with unplanned overnight stay stratified by procedure type 2.5 No Indeterminant
Sensitivity of immediate intraoperative detection of positive SLN (pathology quality measure) 2.5 No Agreement
Patients with myocardial infarction ≤30 days postoperatively 2 No Agreement
Patients with new renal failure ≤30 days postoperatively 2 No Agreement
Patients with new respiratory failure ≤30 days post-operatively 2 No Agreement

ER estrogen receptor; PR progesterone receptor; HER2 human epidermal growth factor 2; AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer; NCCN National Comprehensive Cancer Network; ADH Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia; ALH Atypical lobular hyperplasia; FEA Flat epithelial atypia; LCIS Lobular carcinoma in situ; MRI magnetic resonance imaging; SCIP Surgical care improvment project; DVT Deep venous thrombosis; PE Pulmonary embolism; ASBrS American Society of Breast Surgeons; ACR American College of Radiology; ASTRO American Society of therapuetic radiation oncologists; CME Continuing medical education credits; DCIS Ductal carcinoma in situ; PPV positive predictive value; NPV negative predictive value; CBE clinical breast exam; NSQIP National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; ACS American Cancer Society

aMedian score 1–9: lowest to highest

bValidity: ≥90% of the rankings are in the 7–9 range

cAgreement: Based on scoring dispersion (e.g., for a panel of 13, there is “agreement” if >8 rankings are in any 3-point range and disagreement if >3 rankings are 1–3 and 7–9

Italicized text: Final ASBrS QM chosen for CMS quality payment programs