Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 24;114(36):E7425–E7431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700166114

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fragmentation outcomes for friendship networks. Four villages are shown that had the fewest, median, 75th percentile, and greatest number of nodes. The remaining villages are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S1. IDs correspond to project-assigned village IDs. N is the total number of nodes in the original network and FP is the total number of formal positions in the village. If FP is noted then the FP strategy was used; otherwise, acquaintance and acquaintance-degree strategies were used. Line widths represent 95% confidence intervals.