Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 24;114(36):E7425–E7431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700166114

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Average degree of node removed by acquaintance and FP strategies. Four villages are shown that had the fewest, median, 75th percentile, and greatest number of nodes. The remaining villages are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S4. The average degree for each node removed is shown up to the number of FPs. IDs correspond to project-assigned village IDs. The type of network is labeled accordingly. One thousand iterations were run and line widths represent 95% confidence intervals.