Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 22;114(36):9593–9598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706253114

Table 1.

Mean differences (SDs in parentheses) between conditions for opportunity variables for each study

Opportunity scales Inequality condition Control condition American dream condition
Study 1
 Structural 3.49a (0.83) 3.15b (0.84) —–
 Individual 4.09a (0.89) 4.33b (0.71) —–
n = 244 n = 236
Study 2
 Structural 3.30a (0.83) 3.07b (0.80) 3.33a (0.85)
 Individual 4.22a (0.80) 4.30a (0.79) 4.44b (0.69)
n = 431 n = 441 n = 433
Study 3
 Structural 3.45a (0.85) 3.17b (0.81) —–
 Individual 4.25a (0.80) 4.44b (0.60) —–
n = 714 n = 787

Unadjusted means for the structural and individual factors related to success for each experimental condition and each study. All opportunity items were assessed on a 1 to 5 scale (with 1 being “not at all important” and 5 being “essential”). Means within a study, but across conditions (i.e., within rows), that have different superscripts (a/b) differ significantly from one another (all Ps < 0.01). The n for each condition for each study is presented after the means (and SDs). Dashes indicate that no data were collected for that condition.