Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 21;8(13):2643–2652. doi: 10.7150/jca.20234

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of parameters associated with overall survival in ccRCC patients with wild-type BAP1

Variables HR 95% CI P value
Univariate Cox regression analysis
Age (≥ 60 vs. <60) 2.849 1.772-4.581 <0.001
Gender (male vs. female) 0.949 0.613-1.469 0.815
Ethnicity (Caucasians vs. non-Caucasians) 1.147 0.362-3.635 0.816
AJCC stage (Ⅲ+Ⅳ vs. Ⅰ+Ⅱ) 4.874 3.023-7.857 <0.001
Tumor size (T3+T4 vs. T1+T2) 3.791 2.427-5.922 <0.001
Metastasis status (M1 vs. M0) 4.720 3.074-7.247 <0.001
Fuhrman grade (G3+G4 vs. G1+G2) 2.645 1.619-4.319 <0.001
Surgical type (RN vs. PN) 5.131 1.882-13.99 0.001
Risk Score (High Risk vs. Low Risk) 2.354 1.514-3.660 <0.001
Multivariate Cox regression analysis a
Age (≥ 60 vs. <60) 2.341 1.452-3.775 <0.001
AJCC stage (Ⅲ+Ⅳ vs. Ⅰ+Ⅱ) 2.664 1.529-4.642 0.001
Metastasis status (M1 vs. M0) 2.069 1.251-3.420 0.005
Risk Score (High Risk vs. Low Risk) 1.602 1.012-2.536 0.044

ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma; BAP1, BRCA1 associated protein-1; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidential interval; AJCC, AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; RN, radical nephrectomy; PN, partial nephrectomy.

a The final results after stepwise analysis with Backward (LR) method