Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 24;6:e28141. doi: 10.7554/eLife.28141

Figure 5. Comparisons of averaged z recognition indices (d’, R, F) between the damaged MTT and intact MTT subgroups and controls, using permutation tests.

Figure 5.

*p<0.05. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001. ns = non significant. Boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, the lines in the boxes the medians. Notches display the variability of the median between samples (Same details than described in the legend of the Figure 2). The black diamond represents the case P1, whose MTT is intact according to the Morel atlas but damaged as found in the volume analysis.