Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 28;16(5):1051–1061. doi: 10.1111/acel.12638

Table 1.

Static and dynamic histomorphometry in Cnr1/2 double‐knockout (Cnr1/2−/−) and wild‐type mice

Age Genotype Oc.N/BS (cells mm−1) Act.Res/BS (%) Ob.N/BS (cells mm−1) MAR (μm day−1) MS/BS (%) BFR/BS (μ)m3 (μ)m−2 day−1 AdipoS/BS (%)
3 months Wild‐type 0.78 ± 0.18 2.45 ± 0.19 22.5 ± 1.6 4.1 ± 0.2 51.9 ± 1.5 2.1 ± 0.2 0.013 ± 0.01
CNR1/2−/− 0.60 ± 0.16* 1.9 ± 0.12* 17.9 ± 1.0 4.3 ± 0.1 51.6 ± 0.8 2.2 ± 0.1 0.011 ± 0.01
12 months Wild‐type 1.7 ± 0.2 4.9 ± 0.5 17.6 ± 1.5 1.7 ± 0.4 46.8 ± 1.7 0.8 ± 0.05 0.09 ± 0.01
CNR1/2 −/− 1.4 ± 0.1* 4.5 ± 0.4** 11.7 ± 0.1** 1.8 ± 0.1 32.8 ± 2.6** 0.6 ± 0.06** 0.30 ± 0.07**

Act.Res; active resorption surface/bone surface (%); Oc.N/BS, osteoclast number/bone surface (cells/mm); AdipoS/BS, adipocyte surface/bone surface (%); Ob.N/BS, osteoblast number /bone surface (cells/mm); MAR, mineral apposition rate (μm day−1); MS/BS, mineralizing surface/bone surface (%); BFR/BS: bone formation rate/bone surface (μ)m3 (μ)m−2 day−1; values are means ± SEM and are obtained from six to eight animals. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 between genotype groups.