Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 10;46(6):655–666. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0858-6

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

a The number of livestock lost per village has a stronger relationship with the total population of livestock in that village. b There is, however, a weak positive relationship with the size of the local dog populations across villages. c The number of livestock lost per village is weakly negatively correlated to garbage area. d However, there is no relationship between livestock loss per village and distance from high-dog population area (Kaza or Rangrik)