Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 4;83(10):2195–2204. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13327

Table 4.

Dose interventions per patient

Imatinib (n = 70) Sunitinib (n = 27) Pazopanib (n = 12) Total (n = 109)
Dosage advices by hospital pharmacist (n = 109)
Patients with the advice to maintain current dose, n (%) 27 (38.6) 5 (18.5) 5 (41.7) 37 (33.9)
Patients with dose adjustment advice, n (%) 43 (61.4) 22 (81.5) 7 (58.3) 72 (66.1)
Implementation of proposed dose interventions (n = 72)
Patients for whom proposed interventions were implemented, n (% of proposed interventions) 20 (46.5) 17 (77.3) 4 (57.1) 41 (56.9)
Patients for whom proposed interventions were not implemented, n (% of proposed interventions) 23 (43.5) 5 (22.7) 3 (42.9) 31 (43.1)
Effect of dose interventions (n = 41)
Patients with adequate C trough after intervention, n (% of implemented interventions) 19 (95.0) 13 (76.5) 3 (75.0) 35 (85.4)
Patients with inadequate C trough despite intervention, n (% of implemented interventions) 1 (5%) 4 (23.5) 1 (25.0) 6 (14.6)

GIST: gastrointestinal stromal tumour; ALL: acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; CML: chronic myeloid leukaemia; mRCC: metastatic renal cell carcinoma; STS: soft tissue sarcoma; cKIT: proto‐oncogene cKIT; BCR‐Abl: fusion gene of breakpoint cluster region gene and Abelson murine leukaemia viral oncogene; PDGFRA: platelet‐derived growth factor receptor‐α; Ctrough: trough level.