Skip to main content
. 2017 May 15;41(10):2426–2434. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4028-1

Table 1.

Proposed indicators to monitor and evaluate surgical systems

Domain Best for Indicator Reference
Access Surgical system Access to timely essential surgery WHO Core 100**
Specialist surgical workforce density WHO Core 100**
Trauma care Estimated proportion of seriously injured patients transported by ambulance WHO IMR
Trauma and obstetrics National whole blood donation rate WHO GDBS
Obstetrics C-section rate WHO Core 100+
Anaesthesia Proportion of operating theatres with pulse oximetry WHO PSPOP
Ratio of anaesthetists to surgeons WHO Core 100**
Quality Surgical system Surgical Volume WHO Core 100**
Perioperative mortality rate (POMR) WHO Core 100
Trauma care Inpatient trauma mortality rate ACS COT
Obstetrics Maternal Mortality Ratio (proportion due to maternal haemorrhage, obstructed labour) WHO Core 100**
Neonatal mortality WHO Core 100
Anaesthesia POMR on operative day WHO Core 100**
Financial risk protection Surgical system Protection against impoverishing expenditure WHO Core 100**
Protection against catastrophic expenditure WHO Core 100**

Core LCoGS measure for surgical systems strengthening, WHO Core 100: Worth Health Organization’s Global Reference List of 100 Core Health Indicators, 2015, WHO Core 100** the surgically relevant indicator can be disaggregated from existing Core 100 indicators, WHO Core 100+ signifies a Core 100 “Additional Indicator”, WHO IMR: WHO’s Indicator and Measurement Registry, WHO GBDS: WHO’s Global Database on Blood Safety, WHO PSPOP: WHO’s Patient Safety Pulse Oximetry Project, ACS COT: American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma