Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 14;31(9):1944–1950. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.192

Table 2. Exposure.

  24-Week double-blind period
48-Week open-label DAR
  Placebo (n=48) DAR (n=98) Prior placebo (n=38) Prior DAR (n=87)
Received all eight doses 37 (77) 77 (79) NA NA
Number of doses received NA 8 (1–8) 20 (3–23) 19 (1–23)
Average dose (μg) NA 500 (25–500) 500 (300–500) 500 (193–500)
         
Dose reduced due to rapid Hgb rise
 Once 0 16 (16) 7 (18) 18 (21)
 Twice 0 2 (2) 5 (13) 11 (13)
 3 Times 0 0 5 (13) 3 (3)
 4 Times 0 0 1 (3) 0
 In patients who also had HI-E 0 4 (4) 9 (24) 18 (21)
Hgb for dose reduction, g/dl NA 10.6 (8.4–12) 10.6 (8.5–11.9) 10.6 (8.5–11.9)
         
Dose not administered
 Withheld as Hgb >12 g/dl 0 11 (11)a 12 (32) 24 (28)
 Doses withheld in patients who also had HI-E 0 4 (4) 8 (21) 18 (21)
 Adverse event 5 (10) 2 (2) 1 (3) 7 (8)
 Noncompliance 0 1 (1) 6 (16) 12 (14)
 Other 1 (2)b 2 (2)c 4 (11)d 12 (14)e

Abbreviations: DAR, darbepoetin alfa; Hgb, hemoglobin; HI-E, hematologic improvement-erythroid response; IP, investigational product; NA, not applicable.

Data are median (min–max) or n (%).

a

Dose was withheld once for six patients, twice for four patients, and three times for one patient.

b

No IP on site.

c

Reasons for other were investigator decision and no IP on site.

d

Other included unknown (n=3) and no IP on site (n=1).

e

Other included unknown (n=7) and one each of investigator decision, patient unable to go to clinic, interactive voice response system malfunction, investigator concern regarding high Hgb value and investigator felt there was a lack of efficacy.