Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 1;29(3):165–171. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.16.055

Table 1.

Demographics, Characteristics, and Definitions

Author Study type Blinding Treatment methods compared PRP group vs. control group No. of PRP injections Outcome measures in study Follow-up Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria
Dragoo et al.12) Randomised controlled trial Double blinded PRP injections vs. ultrasound guided dry needling (plus standardized eccentric exercises) PRP (n=9), control (n=12) 1 Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment score
Pain visual analogue scale
Tegner activity scale
Lysholm knee scale
Short-form questionnaire
3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks and >6 months Patellar tendinosis with persistence of symptoms after 6 weeks (12 sessions) of physical therapy with eccentric exercise
Confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging
Aged >18
Previous injection or surgery in the affected knee
Inability to complete patient reported outcome surveys
Vatrano et al.13) Randomised controlled trial Single blinded PRP injections vs. focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (plus a standardized stretching and muscle strengthening protocol) PRP (n=23), control (n=23) 2 (1 per week for 2 weeks) Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment score
Pain visual analogue scale
Modified Blazina scale
2, 6, and 12 months Chronic unilateral patellar tendinosis with symptoms >6 months and refractory to nonsurgical management
“Washout period” of 12 weeks between any non-operative therapy and inclusion in the study
Confirmed by ultrasound scan
Athletic participants
Aged 18–50
Bilateral complaints
Signs or symptoms of other coexisting knee lesions; knee surgery or steroid injections within 3 months
Signs of disorders
Therapy with anticoagulants-antiaggregants; platelet values of fewer than 150,000/mm3
Pregnancy

PRP: platelet-rich plasma.