Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 19;24(2):130–140. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2016.1259636

Table 3.

Effect of covariates on baseline refractive error in study eyes with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and fellow eyes without CNV using various regression approaches, Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials

Covariates Standard linear
regression model
Mixed model, random
intercept
(unstructured or
compound symmetry)
Marginal model:
PROC MIXED with
REPEATED
unstructured
Marginal model:
GEE, working
independence
Marginal model: GEE,
compound symmetry
Regression
coefficient
(SE)
P-value Regression
coefficient
(SE)
P-value Regression
coefficient
(SE)
P-value Regression
coefficient
(SE)
P-value Regression
coefficient
(SE)
P-value
Group (study eye vs fellow) 0.15 (0.09) 0.10 0.15 (0.07) 0.03 0.15 (0.07) 0.03 0.15 (0.07) 0.03 0.15 (0.07) 0.03
Age (per year) 0.01 (0.01) 0.20 0.01 (0.01) 0.29 0.01 (0.01) 0.29 0.01 (0.01) 0.21 0.01 (0.01) 0.22
Sex (female vs male) 0.05 (0.10) 0.58 0.05 (0.12) 0.66 0.06 (0.12) 0.62 0.05 (0.10) 0.60 0.05 (0.10) 0.61
Current smoking (yes vs no) 0.21 (0.18) 0.24 0.21 (0.21) 0.33 0.20 (0.21) 0.33 0.21 (0.23) 0.38 0.21 (0.23) 0.37
Geographic atrophy (no vs yes) 0.07 (0.16) 0.64 0.03 (0.15) 0.82 0.04 (0.15) 0.78 0.07 (0.20) 0.71 0.03 (0.19) 0.85
Glaucoma (no v. yes) 0.25 (0.14) 0.08 0.24 (0.17) 0.16 0.25 (0.17) 0.14 0.25 (0.24) 0.31 0.24 (0.24) 0.32

GEE, generalized estimating equation; SE, standard error