Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep;83:302–312. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.037

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(A) Kaplan–Meier survivor functions for each treatment group. (B) Pairwise comparisons of survival showing HRs (adjusted for stage and performance status) with two-sided 95% CIs (solid line) for assessment of difference (compare either end against HR = 1) and one-sided 95% CIs (dashed line) for assessment of non-inferiority (compare upper values against HR = 1.2).