Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep;83:302–312. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.037

Table 2.

Comparison of secondary outcome measures across treatment arms.

Secondary outcome measure GC80 GC50 GCb6 p-value
Best overall response rate
Number (%) of patients with reported CR or PR 132/456 (29%) 92/454 (20%) 123/453 (27%) 0.007
Dose intensity for platinum
N 423 430 406
Median 94% 98% 83% <0.0001
Interquartile range 81%–99% 90%–100% 72%–97%
Range 22%–116% 19%–113% 19%–118%
Number (%) of patients ≥90% 256 (61%) 327 (76%) 146 (36%)
Dose intensity for gemcitabine
N 419 429 423
Median 87% 94% 80%
Interquartile range 74–98% 83–99% 68–94% <0.0001
Range 40–116% 43–107% 32–106%
Number (%) of patients ≥90% 192 (46%) 260 (61%) 127 (30%)
Proportion of chemotherapy delivery days as an outpatient
N 441 444 439
Median 87.5% 100% 100% <0.0001
Number (%) of patients 100% 207 (47%) 246 (55%) 281 (64%)
Adverse events
Number (%) of patients with at least 1 grade 3 or 4 adverse event reported during treatment 190/441 (43%) 133/444 (30%) 263/439 (60%) <0.0001

CR, complete response; PR, partial response.