Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 17;2:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2015.07.001

Table 2.

Results obtained with procalcitonin immunoassays compared to BRAHMS PCT Kryptor.

Values (ng/mL)a P (Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney)b Spearman's correlation (r)b Deming fitb Mean bias and 95% CI (ng/mL)b
Kryptor 1.40 (0.35–5.37)
Liaison 1.63 (0.32–5.78) 0.052 0.986 (p<0.001) y=1.02x+0.22 0.38 (−0.08 to 0.83)
Vidas 1.95 (0.33–6.40) <0.001 0.979 (p<0.001) y=1.40x−0.09 2.70 (1.55 to 3.86)
Cobas E601 1.30 (0.30–4.90) 0.085 0.988 (p<0.001) y=1.12x−0.47 0.40 (−0.17 to 0.97)
Advia Centaur 1.35 (0.32–5.11) 0.001 0.984 (p<0.001) y=0.80x+0.40 −1.02 (−1.67 to −0.36)
Diazyme (Architect) 1.27 (0.28–4.53) 0.038 0.899 (p<0.001) y=0.95x−0.16 −0.51 (−1.07 to 0.06)
Diazyme (Advia 2400) 0.88 (1.154.46) 0.341 0.927 (p<0.001) y=1.01x−0.23 −0.13 (−0.77 to 0.51)
Diazyme (Cobas C501) 0.90 (0.484.38) 0.004 0.899 (p<0.001) y=0.85x+0.07 −1.01 (−1.76 to −0.26)
Diazyme (AU5800) 0.82 (0.42–4.82) 0.002 0.899 (p<0.001) y=0.87x−0.04 −0.87 (−1.47 to −0.27)
a

Median and interquartile range.

b

Versus BRAHMS PCT Kryptor.