Table 3.

Brain regions exhibiting significant differences in RSFC with the abnormal FCD regions (in italic) between the SAD and HC groups

	Regions	Side	BA	t	Size	MNI
						x	y	z
Right rACC
SAD >HC	None
SAD <HC
Cluster 1	STG	R	21	5.73	105	69	−12	−6
Cluster 2	Precuneus/MCC	R/L	7/31	5.59	426	0	−30	48
Cluster 3	SFGa	L	9	4.82	35	−18	45	36
Cluster 4	MFGa	R	6/8	4.47	58	30	15	60
Cluster 5	SFGa	R	10	4.21	45	15	63	18
Right STG
SAD >HC	None
SAD <HC
Cluster 1	STG	L	43/41/22/42	5.34	344	−54	−12	9
Cluster 2	Insula	R	13/21/22	5.02	262	33	6	6
	Putamen	R
Cluster 3	STGa	R	42/43/21/21	4.97	385	66	−18	9
Cluster 4	PTCG/PRCG	R	4/6/3	4.52	180	51	−18	54
Cluster 5	Middle TPO	R	38	4.33	26	30	15	−39
Cluster 6	PRCG/PTCG	L	4/6	4.30	97	−42	−15	54
Cluster 7	SMA	L	6/24	3.93	44	−3	−6	54
Cluster 8	IFG	R	46	3.88		57	30	27

Coordinates refer to the local peak within each cluster. Results were thresholded at FDR < 0.05, K > 20. rACC, rostral anterior cingulate cortex; STG, superior temporal gyrus; MCC, middle cingulate cortex; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; PTCG, postcentral gyrus; PRCG, precentral gyrus; TPO, temporal pole; SMA, supplementary area; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus. BA, Broadmann area; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere; SAD, social anxiety disorder; HC, healthy control.

^aRSFC between these regions and the abnormal FCD regions contributed most substantially to SAD diagnosis