Table 7.

Variables of the two success-domains and the proportion of evaluated projects scoring on the positive side of the scale (4 & 5 on a scale from 1 to 5) to each variable

Proportion of projects scoring on the positive side of the scale (score 4 and 5) to each of the variables of the success factors
Domain I: Measurement & Guidance	Successful n = 54	Comparator n = 78
Q7: Someone in the improvement team enjoyed working with measurement	87	56
Q10: We got hold on our coach when needed between the Learning sessions (LS)	74	57
Q11: Is the availability of the coach between the LS of any importance to make successful improvements?	83	54
Q12: We had good guidance and help with measurements	81	50
Q13: Is good guidance and help with measurements of any importance to succeed with the improvement work?	59	73
Q18: The improvement team learned SPC	77	46
Q19: Is the measure method SPC of any importance to succeed with improvement efforts?	76	57
Q20: The control-charts were easy to communicate to our peers in the site.	78	51
Q21: Is it of any importance for successful changes that the control-charts are easy to communicate to the peers in the site?	67	53
Domain III Professional environment	Successful n = 54	Comparator n = 78
Q16: We based the improvement efforts on patient-focused aims	94	91
Q17: Are patient-focused aims of any importance to engage the healthcare professionals in the improvement efforts? (No negative scores found)	94	90
Q1: Referring to the senior expert team made our change ideas more feasible to the peers in the site	75	76
Q6: The project was well grounded in the professional environment	74	67
Q5: We organized the improvement efforts well in spite of the difficult resource situation (time and personnel)	83	83
Q22: We presented measurements continually to maintain motivation.	83	71
Q23: Is it of any importance to present measurements continually maintain motivation?	74	72