Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 15;9(2):76–85. doi: 10.1556/1646.9.2017.2.18

Table IV.

Distribution of presence and absence of prediabetes per score category and corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values when dichotomized at different cutoff points

Development stage
Risk category Prediabetes (n = 8.911) Normal (n = 12.809) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI)
VLR (score 0–6), n = 6.374 1.767 4.607
LR (score 7), n = 6.685 2.686 3.999 80.17 (79.33–80.99) 35.97 (35.14–36.80) 46.55 (46.14–46.97) 72.28 (71.31–73.22)
MR (score 12), n = 8.285 4.249 4.036 50.03 (48.98–51.07) 67.19 (66.37–68.00) 51.47 (50.66–52.28) 65.90 (65.36–66.44)
HR (score 18), n = 376 209 167 2.35 (2.04–2.68) 98.70 (98.48–98.89) 55.59 (50.57–60.49) 59.23 (59.14–59.32)
Validation stage
Risk category Prediabetes (n = 548) Normal (n = 6.385) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI)
VLR (score 0–6), n = 2.451 90 2.361
LR (score 7), n = 1.997 156 1.841 83.58 (80.20–86.58) 36.98 (35.79–38.17) 10.22 (9.84–10.61) 96.33 (95.59–96.95)
MR (score 12), n = 2.366 286 2.080 55.11 (50.84–59.33) 65.81 (64.63–66.97) 12.15 (11.30–13.07) 94.47 (93.95–94.94)
HR (score 18), n = 119 16 103 2.92 (1.68–4.70) 98.39 (98.05–98.68) 13.45 (8.46–20.71) 92.19 (92.08–92.30)

In development stage: AUC = 0.623 (95% CI 0.616–0.631), whereas in validation stage by random plasma glucose [n = 6.993; AUC = 0.646 (95% CI 0.623–0.669); Hosmer–Lemeshow test, p < 0.001]