Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 20;31(5):1392–1402. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14800

Table 1.

Demographic data for the dogs of the total group, test set, and training set

Variable Total Group (n = 1719) Training Set (n = 1200) Test Set (n = 519) P‐Values
Age (years) 6.9 (0.04–19.0) 6.8 (0.04–19.0) 7.0 (0.16–16.0) 0.52
Weight (kilograms) 18.0 (0.4–96.0) 17.0 (0.4–94.0) 20.0 (0.8–96.0) 0.26
BCS (9‐point scale) 5 (1–9) 5 (1–9) 5 (1–9) 0.04*
Sex 0.97
Neutered Males 723 (42.0%) 509 (42.4%) 214 (41.2%)
Intact Males 166 (9.7%) 114 (9.5%) 52 (10.1%)
Spayed Females 718 (41.8%) 499 (41.6%) 219 (42.2%)
Intact Females 112 (6.5%) 78 (6.5%) 34 (6.5%)
Calcium Status 0.56
Hypocalcemic 280 (16.3%) 202 (16.8%) 78 (15.0%)
Hypercalcemic 99 (5.8%) 71 (5.9%) 28 (5.4%)
Normocalcemic 1340 (77.9%) 927 (77.3%) 413 (79.6%)

Table entries represent median values (minimum–maximum) for continuous variables (age, weight, and body condition score) and number of dogs (percent of dogs) for categorical variables (sex and calcium status). Calcium status categories were determined based on measured ionized calcium values. Significant differences between the dogs of the training set and those of the test set, as assessed via the Mann–Whitney (age, weight, and body condition score) and chi‐square (sex and calcium status) tests, were defined by a P‐value<0.05 and are indicated by *.