Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 28;6(9):e1322242. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1322242

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients involved in the study.

Patients characteristics % p (OS) HR p (DFS) HR
Age (y)            
 Median 63   0.319 1.572 0.772 1.088
 Range 37–77          
Gender            
 Female, n (%) 44 49        
 Male, n (%) 46 51 0.784 0.892 0.1 0.626
Tumor stage            
 T1, n (%) 1 1 ND   ND  
 T2, n (%) 2 2        
 T3, n (%) 86 96        
 T4, n (%) 1 1        
Nodal stage            
 N0, n (%) 13 14        
 N+, n (%) 77 86 0.441 1.768 0.408 1.435
Metastasis stage            
 M0, n (%) 90 100        
 M+, n (%) 0 0 ND   ND  
Location            
 Head, n (%) 71 79        
 Body/tail, n (%) 19 21 0.490 0.720 0.346 0.732
Resection margins            
 R0, n (%) 41 46        
 R1, n (%) 49 54 0.394 1.441 0.121 1.573
Adjuvant therapy            
 No, n (%) 16 18        
 Yes, n (%) 74 82 0.157 0.510 0.038 0.502
 Non-gemcitabine based, n (%) 2 3        
 Gemcitabine-based, n (%) 72 97 ND   ND  
Radiotherapy            
 No, n (%) 65 72        
 Yes, n (%) 25 28 0.383 0.643 0.430 0.775
Tumor grade            
 G1, n (%) 7 8        
 G2, n (%) 58 64        
 G3, n (%) 25 28 0.001 3.986 0.012 2.109

HR, hazard ratio; R1, resection denotes a microscopically positive margin; T, Tumor; N, node; G, grade.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure