Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2017 Aug 30;41-42:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2017.08.002

Table 3.

Chi Square Analyses of Agreement on Item Pairs

Item Description Agreement (%) χ2 p κ Φ or OR
Receptive Language
Listens and looks 97.2 .999 −.012 -
Recognizes name 91.7 .007 .358 16.2
Understands “no” 93.6 .173 .189 8.4
Follows one-step instructions 75.2 19.191 < .001 .419 .42
Recognizes 3+ body parts 62.4 17.746 < .001 .318 .40
Follows two-step instructions 77.1 16.898 < .001 .393 .39
Identifies pictures of named objects 69.7 23.150 < .001 .413 .46
Expressive Language
Names 3+ objects 58.7 15.743 < .001 .252 .38
Names 10+ objects 76.1 .001 .216 -
Fine Motor
Turns pages in book one by one 69.7 .052 .160 3.5
Stacks four blocks vertically 77.1 29.534 < .001 .516 .52
Uses hand-wrist twisting motion 82.6 < .001 .462 19.5

Note. Where Chi square statistics are absent, Fisher’s Exact p-values are reported due to violations of Chi square assumptions. A significant p-value indicates significant disagreement between methods. For items using Fisher’s Exact test, an odds ratio (OR) was used as a measure of effect size, except in cases where one cell in the contingency table equaled 0.