Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;475(10):2484–2499. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5379-5

Table 1.

Demographic details from the included studies

Study Year Study design Level of evidence Patients treated Patients at followup Followup rate (%) Followup after revision ACL-R (years) Mean age at revision ACL-R (years) Mean time from 1° ACL-R to Revision ACL (months)
O’Neill [22] 2004 Prospective IV 50 48
28 M/20 F
96% 7.5
(2–13)
33
(13–57)
60
(7–276)
Grossman et al. [12] 2005 Retrospective IV 35 29
22 M/7 F
83% 5.6 30.2 56
(9–192)
Thomas et al. [27] 2005 Prospective III 49 49
37 M/12 F
100% 6.2
(3–11)
35.4 NA
Ferretti et al. [7] 2006 Retrospective IV 30 30 100% 5.0
(2–8)
34
(21–39)
60
(12–132)
Lidén et al. [16] 2006 Retrospective IV 14 12 86% 9.6
(8.5–10.6)
28
(23–39)
64
(15–132)
Salmon et al. [23] 2006 Prospective IV 57 50 88% 7.4
(5.0–9.1)
27
(15–39)
36
(2–132)
Battaglia et al. [3] 2007 Retrospective IV 95 63
36 M/27 F
66% 6.1
(3.0–13.2)
31
(18–60)
61
(3–316)
Diamantopoulos et al. [6] 2008 Retrospective IV 148 107
64 M/43 F
72% 6.0 ± 1.7 39 ± 9 60 ± 54
Ahn et al. [2] 2011 Retrospective IV 50 41 82% 6.3
(3.5–9.8)
32
(21–55)
59
(6–216)
Lind et al. [17] 2012 Retrospective IV 168 128
64 M/64 F
76% 5.9
(2.0–9.0)
31 58
(0–311)
Mayr et al. [19] 2012 Retrospective III 17 (autografts) 15
9 M/6 F
88% 5.7 ± 0.6 30 ± 9 NA
17 (allografts) 14 82% 5.8 ± 0.5 35 ± 13 NA
Franceschi et al. [8] 2013 Retrospective IV 30 30
19 M/11 F
100% 6.8
(5–9)
29.1
(19–42)
34
Gifstad et al. [9] 2013 Retrospective III 69 56
25 M/31 F
81% 7.5
(2.8–13.2)
26.5 38
(5–117)
Kievit et al. [14] 2013 Retrospective III 30 25
18 M/7 F
86% 5.3
(2.3–12.2)
34.6 NA
Chougule et al. [4] 2015 Retrospective IV 20 20
14 M/6 F
100% 6.0 33.7 NA

Values are mean ± SD or numbers with ranges in parentheses; ACL-R = anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; ACL = anterior cruciate ligament; M = male; F = female; NA = not applicable.