Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 31;19(8):e303. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7487

Table 3.

Risk of bias assessment. Outcome data are considered complete if ≥90% of those randomized were included in outcome data.

First author (year) Random sequence
generation
Allocation
concealment
Blinding of
participants
and personnel
Blinding of
outcome
assessment
Complete outcome data
or intention-to-treat
analysis used
All outcomes
reported
Gardner-Nix (2008) [34] No No No No No Yes
Buhrman (2013) [29] Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
Davis (2013) [33] Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
Dowd (2015) [30] Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
Trompetter (2015) [31] Yes Unclear No No Yes Yes
Younge (2015) [35] Yes Yes No Yes No No
Ljótsson (2010) [36] Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
Ljótsson (2011) [38] Yes Yes No Unclear Yes Yes
Ljótsson (2011) [39] Yes No No No Yes Yes
Ljótsson (2014) [40] Yes Yes No Unclear Yes Yes
Thompson (2010) [41] Yes Yes No No No Yes
Thompson (2015) [42] Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
Hesser (2012) [43] Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
Johansson (2015) [44] No No No No Noa Yes
Zernicke (2014) [45] Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
Bruggeman-Everts (2015) [47] No No No No Yes Yes

aIntention-to-treat analysis conducted with a subset of participants but not all.