Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 19;19(3):463–467. doi: 10.1111/dom.12837

Table 1.

Secondary and other efficacy endpoints

Point estimate for treatment difference (95% CI)
Alogliptin once daily (n = 71) Alogliptin once daily/metformin once daily (n = 152) Alogliptin once daily/metformin twice daily (n = 151) Alogliptin once daily/metformin once daily vs alogliptin once daily alone Alogliptin once daily/metformin once daily vs alogliptin once daily/metformin twice daily
Number patients evaluable 71 149 1 or 152 151
Number of patients with HbA1c <7.0% at week 24, n (%) 3 (4.8) 48 (35.0) 48 (34.3) 30.3 (20.7, 39.8) 0.8 (−10.5, 12.0)
Mean changes from baseline to week 24, mean (s.d.)
Fasting glucose, mg/dL 7.4 (26.9) −7.6 (26.4) −18.2 (25.4) −14.9 (−22.5, −7.4) 10.6 (4.7, 16.5)
Fasting insulin, μU/mL −0.1 (4.0) −0.2 (4.0) −0.6 (4.2) −0.1 (−1.2, 1.1) 0.3 (−0.6, 1.3)
Fasting glucagon, pg/mL −0.6 (15.1) 1.9 (18.4) −0.8 (18.6) 2.5 (−2.4, 7.5) 2.7 (−1.5, 6.9)
HOMA‐IR 0.2 (2.1) −0.3 (2.0) −0.6 (2.0) −0.5 (−1.1, 0.1) 0.3 (−0.1, 0.8)
HOMA‐β −3.4 (13.2) 3.2 (17.4) 4.8 (15.4) 6.6 (2.0, 11.2) −1.6 (−5.3, 2.2)
Body weight, kg −0.1 (1.5) 0.0 (1.5) 0.0 (1.7) 0.1 (−0.3, 0.5) 0.0 (−0.4, 0.4)

Abbreviations: HOMA‐β, homeostatic model assessment of β‐cell function; HOMA‐IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; s.d., standard deviation.

1

Three randomized patients were not evaluable for evaluation of fasting insulin, HOMA‐IR or HOMA‐β.