Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 2;95(6):551–566. doi: 10.1111/aos.13403

Table 2.

Sensitivity analysis of the meta‐analysis results of cross‐sectional study

Study excluded Random‐effects models Heterogeneity
OR 95% CI I 2 (%) p Value
Clinical trial
None 0.536 0.338 to 0.850 88.5 <0.001
He et al. (2015) 0.435 0.344 to 0.550 0.00 0.829
Jin et al. (2015) 0.589 0.340 to 1.018 92.9 <0.001
Wu et al. (2015) 0.594 0.323 to 1.091 80.0 0.025
Cohort Study
None 0.574 0.395 to 0.834 70.9 0.032
French et al. (2013) – younger cohort 0.693 0.548 to 0.877 0.00 0.933
French et al. (2013) – older cohort 0.514 0.288 to 0.917 80.2 0.025
Guggenheim et al. (2012) – 0.521 0.286 to 0.947 82.5 0.017
Cross‐sectional Study
None 0.964 0.945 to 0.982 93.2 <0.001
Chua et al. (2015) 0.963 0.944 to 0.982 93.7 <0.001
Zhou et al. (2015) 0.963 0.943 to 0.983 93.7 <0.001
Pan et al. (2015) 0.960 0.939 to 0.982 93.7 <0.001
Guo et al. (2015) 0.963 0.944 to 0.983 93.7 <0.001
Lee et al. (2015) 0.960 0.937 to 0.983 93.2 <0.001
Zhou et al. (2014) 0.961 0.942 to 0.981 93.7 <0.001
Guo et al. (2013) 0.984 0.979 to 0.991 39.8 0.075
Low et al. (2010) 0.960 0.940 to 0.981 93.7 <0.001
Deng et al. (2010) 0.965 0.947 to 0.984 93.7 <0.001
Dirani et al. (2009) 0.961 0.938 to 0.983 93.7 <0.001
Lu et al. (2009) 0.963 0.945 to 0.982 93.7 <0.001
Ip et al. (2008) 0.963 0.944 to 0.983 93.7 <0.001
Mutti et al. (2002) 0.966 0.948 to 0.985 93.6 <0.001