Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;16(2):129–136. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2016-0036

Table 3.

P values of statistical comparison of rCBV between algorithms

WHO Grade Algorithm

(2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
Grade II
(1) 0.982 1.000 0.995 0.776 0.999 0.999 0.281 0.076 0.926 0.127
(2) - 0.992 1.000 0.055 1.000 0.458 0.003 <0.001 0.135 0.001
(3) - 0.999 0.486 1.000 0.982 0.090 0.011 0.698 0.030
(4) - 0.101 1.000 0.593 0.004 <0.001 0.146 0.001
(5) - 0.180 0.993 1.000 0.969 1.000 0.989
(6) - 0.689 0.008 <0.001 0.210 0.003
(7) - 0.822 0.341 1.000 0.583
(8) - 1.000 0.996 1.000
(9) - 0.832 1.000
(10) - 0.946
(11) -
Grade III
(1) 0.990 1.000 0.975 0.920 1.000 0.839 0.744 0.172 0.864 0.524
(2) - 1.000 1.000 0.151 0.998 0.236 0.093 0.001 0.177 0.027
(3) - 1.000 0.522 1.000 0.488 0.377 0.011 0.347 0.156
(4) - 0.348 0.996 0.268 0.194 0.018 0.172 0.096
(5) - 0.788 1.000 1.000 0.752 1.000 1.000
(6) - 0.786 0.549 0.093 0.825 0.341
(7) - 1.000 0.975 1.000 1.000
(8) - 0.889 1.000 1.000
(9) - 0.996 0.991
(10) - 1.000
(11) -
Grade IV
(1) <0.001 0.490 0.478 0.861 0.204 0.464 0.052 <0.001 <0.001 0.961
(2) - <0.001 0.002 <0.001 0.045 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
(3) - 1.000 0.006 1.000 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.019
(4) - 0.008 1.000 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.046
(5) - 0.006 0.957 0.955 0.083 0.001 1.000
(6) - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.008
(7) - 1.000 0.992 0.728 0.815
(8) - 0.846 0.047 0.505
(9) - 0.926 0.007
(10) - <0.001
(11) -

Bold type indicates statistical significance at 0.05 level (Steel-Dwass nonparametric multiple comparison test).