Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 10;7(5):273–289. doi: 10.1111/cob.12203

Table 1.

Review articles focusing on obesity or weight management and HRQoL

No. Author, date Type/goal of review Studies Key findings Strengths Limitations
Category 1: Relationship between weight/BMI and HRQoL (baseline/pre‐intervention)
1 van Nunen et al., 2007 14
  • Meta‐analysis to examine differences in baseline HRQoL among seekers of surgical treatment for obesity, seekers of non‐surgical treatment, non‐treatment‐seeking persons with obesity, general population with obesity and general population

  • 54 cross‐sectional studies

  • Dutch, English, French and German

  • 1996–2006

  • Based on both generic and obesity‐specific measures, populations with obesity experienced reduced HRQoL

    • For both SF‐36 and IWQOL‐Lite, the most reduced HRQoL occurred in the surgical patients

    • Comparing patients to non‐patients, SF‐36 results varied widely by subscale, with only physical functioning showing consistently reduced HRQoL for surgical patient groups

    • However, reduced HRQoL was found on all IWQOL‐Lite subscales for patient groups compared with non‐patients

  • After adjustment for BMI, surgical patients still demonstrated reduced HRQoL on most SF‐36 subscales, whereas for IWQOL‐Lite differences between populations disappeared after adjustment for BMI likely due to the IWQOL‐Lite being a weight‐related measure of HRQoL

  • Analysis of HRQoL in 100 000 geographically diverse individuals in different populations

  • Articles included both generic (SF‐36) and obesity‐specific (IWQOL‐Lite) HRQoL measures

  • The general population with obesity is heterogeneous, including those who intend to seek medical intervention, those who plan their own interventions, and those who do not intend to seek treatment

  • There is underrepresentation of the intentionally non–treatment‐seeking population

    • Included in only 2/54 studies

2 Ul‐Haq et al., 2013 15
  • Meta‐analysis to determine the relationships between BMI and physical and mental HRQoL

  • 8 cross‐sectional studies

  • English only

  • 2000–2011

  • Physical HRQoL

    • Individuals with higher BMI had significantly reduced physical HRQoL

    • Clear evidence of a dose relationship across all BMI categories

  • Mental HRQoL

    • Only reduced among individuals classified as Class III obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg m−2)

  • Population studies from Australia, Canada, England, Germany, Sweden, USA

  • Studies included 43 086 participants

  • Sophisticated methodology

    • Analysed pooled estimates of weighted mean difference in PCS and MCS by BMI in reference to normal weight

    • Determined degree of heterogeneity and assessed publication bias

    • Applied a statistical method to reduce risk of type I errors

  • Limited to articles that assessed HRQoL with a single, generic measure only (SF‐36)

  • 1 of 8 studies was based on male Veteran's Administration patients only

Category 2: HRQoL after weight loss (varied interventions and/or varied study design)
3 Carson et al., 2014 16
  • Systematic review to examine the effects of dietary intervention on HRQoL

  • 24 studies of ≥12 weeks' duration, including RCTs (21) and non‐RCT prospective studies (3)

  • English, US only

  • 1990–2012

  • In most studies (88%), study participants reported improved HRQoL after dietary intervention

    • 11/24 studies indicated changes in HRQoL were likely a result of weight loss

    • 4/24 studies demonstrated that changes in HRQoL were independent of weight loss

    • In 9/24 studies, it was unclear if changes in HRQoL were a result of weight loss

  • Articles included used both generic (QWB, SF‐36, SF‐12) and obesity‐specific (IWQOL, IWQOL‐Lite) HRQoL measures

  • 4/24 studies used only non‐obesity‐specific disease measures (e.g. measure of heart failure)

    • 3 of the studies using non‐obesity‐specific measures reported an improvement in HRQoL over time

  • 13/24 studies involved short‐term follow‐ups (12–26 weeks)

4 Kroes et al., 2016 17
  • Systematic review to review evidence for the impact of weight/BMI change on HRQoL

  • 20 studies, including RCTs (8), prospective comparative cohorts (5), prospective single‐arm cohorts (5), cross‐sectional (1) and retrospective analyses of RCTs (1)

  • English, US only

  • ≥1‐year follow‐up

  • Of the studies that explicitly reported on the association between HRQoL and weight change:

    • For lifestyle approach (n = 1): there were significant correlations between weight loss and all IWQOL‐Lite subscales except work

    • For pharmaceutical intervention (n = 1): there were larger effect sizes for greater weight reductions for all IWQOL‐Lite subscales, PCS, physical functioning, and general health

    • For bariatric surgery at ≥1‐year follow‐up: greater weight loss showed significant correlations with vitality (n = 1), physical functioning (n = 1), PCS (n = 1), and IWQOL‐Lite Total (n = 2)

  • SF‐36 (generic): improvements in physical aspects reported more frequently than mental/psychosocial aspects

  • IWQOL‐Lite (obesity‐specific): improvements in all or most subscales

  • Unique approach: to investigate the impact of weight change on HRQoL, rather than to compare improvements in HRQoL between interventions

  • Studies had ≥1‐year follow‐up

  • Included only US, English articles

  • Studies included were heterogeneous in terms of intervention (bariatric surgery [n = 12]; lifestyle approaches [n = 7]; pharmaceutical intervention [n = 1]), as well as study design and outcomes described, making inferences about associations between weight loss and changes in HRQoL challenging

  • Although this review included studies using any HRQoL measurement, reporting was limited to SF‐36 and IWQOL‐Lite

Category 3: HRQoL after weight loss (RCTs only)
5 Maciejewski et al., 2005 18
  • Meta‐analysis to estimate the effect of various weight‐loss interventions (e.g. medication, diet, exercise, commercial programme, cognitive behaviour therapy, bariatric surgery) on HRQoL in RCT studies, and a meta‐analysis of the effect of weight‐loss treatment on depressive symptoms

  • 34 RCTs

  • HRQoL outcomes were not consistently improved in RCTs of weight loss

    • Generic measures: 9/34 studies showed HRQoL improvements in ≥1 domains

    • Obesity‐specific measures: 6/11 studies showed positive treatment effects

  • Articles included used both generic (GHRI, GWB, SF‐36, SIP, VAS) and obesity‐specific (IWQOL, OP) HRQoL measures

  • Study duration varied from 6 to 208 weeks; 8 studies of >52 weeks’ duration and 26 studies of ≤1 year's duration

  • Study quality was assessed according to 6 different criteria: concealment of randomization, blinding, loss to follow‐up, intention‐to‐treat analysis, adjustment for mediating effects of weight loss, and adjustment for multiple comparisons

  • Review stated that quality of studies examined was poor

6 Warkentin et al., 2013 12
  • Systematic review and meta‐analysis to examine the effect of weight loss (any weight‐loss intervention vs. no intervention, placebo or active comparator) on HRQoL in RCTs

  • 53 RCTs met eligibility

  • 11/53 included in meta‐analysis

  • Generic measures: 14/36 studies found significant improvements

  • Obesity‐specific measures: 4/15 studies found significant improvements

  • Contingency table approach (included all trials): no significant association between weight‐loss and overall HRQoL

  • Quantitative data pooling approach (included 25% of trials): statistically significant improvements in physical but not mental health

  • Articles included used both generic (EQ‐5D, GHQ, QWB, SF‐36, VAS) and obesity‐specific (IWQOL‐Lite, M‐A QoLQII, OAS, OP, ORWELL, WRSM) HRQoL measures

  • Different analytical methods were used

    • Contingency table approach: incorporates information from all studies examined, but gives them equal weight, such that the magnitude of changes cannot be compared

    • Conventional random effects meta‐analytical technique: considered to be more rigorous because uses study‐specific values and inverse‐variance weighting to generate pooled estimates; however, quantitative data pooling was limited to only 25% of available studies due to the poor quality of reporting

  • Data from most studies could not be quantitatively pooled for meta‐analysis

  • In 35/53 RCTs, study duration was <1 year

Category 4: HRQoL after bariatric surgery
7 Magallares and Schomerus, 2015 19
  • Meta‐analysis to compare HRQoL before and 1 year after bariatric surgery

  • 21 studies

  • English, German, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish

  • Compared to pre‐surgery, patients scored higher in physical and mental components of the SF‐36 1 year after bariatric surgery

    • The size of the effect was much greater for the physical component than the mental component, but both effects were very high

  • There was a large variability/heterogeneity in amount of improvement in both PCS and MCS

  • Studies drawn from a diverse literature base that encompassed five languages

  • Study design of included studies was not indicated

  • Limited to those with a follow‐up period of ≤1 year and those that administered only SF‐36

8 Lindekilde et al., 2015 20
  • Systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the impact of bariatric surgery (15 different methods) on HRQoL and the between‐study variation

  • 72 studies, including cohort studies (60), non‐randomized studies (5), randomized studies (7)

  • Bariatric surgery had a significant positive influence on HRQoL

    • Influence was greater on physical vs. mental HRQoL

    • Greater effects were found for obesity‐specific measures of HRQoL than for other types

  • A large variability (heterogeneity) in HRQoL outcomes was found

  • Articles included used 22 HRQoL measures, including generic (EQ‐5D, SF‐36), obesity‐specific (IWQOL, IWQOL‐Lite, M‐A QoLQII, WRSM), combined generic/obesity‐specific (HRQoL‐HSP) and gastrointestinal‐specific (GIQLI) HRQoL measures

  • Follow‐up ranged from 3 to 120 months

  • Controlled for multiple other factors (baseline BMI, age, type of measure, type of surgery, months to follow‐up, year of publication and country of study)

  • Provided effect sizes of changes in HRQoL

  • HRQoL scales and subscales were categorized into 5 domains (physical, mental, social, functional and total), but authors do not indicate how they assigned scores to the domains

  • Majority of included studies used a non‐randomized design; none of the randomized studies used a non‐surgical control group

9 Andersen et al., 2015 21
  • Systematic review to study the long‐term (i.e. ≥5 years) effects of bariatric surgery (6 different methods) on HRQoL

  • 7 prospective studies, 2 with control groups

  • English

  • ≥5 year follow‐up

  • 6/7 studies showed improvements in 9 aspects of HRQoL

  • Peak improvements in HRQoL observed during first 1–2 postoperative years (characterized by the most meaningful amount of weight loss), followed by a gradual decline that stabilized at 5 years

  • 5‐year postoperative scores were an improvement from preoperative scores, but lower than the population norm

    • Of the statistically significant improvements in HRQoL, 92% were clinically meaningful (i.e. >0.5 standard deviation change from baseline)

  • Review focuses exclusively on high‐quality, long‐term (5–10 years), prospective studies of bariatric surgery

  • All studies included were high quality, defined as attrition rate <50%, and 90% power to detect >0.5 standard deviation change from baseline using a two‐sided paired test

  • Articles included used both generic (15D, GHRI scale, GWB, NHPII, SF‐36) and obesity‐specific (IWQOL‐Lite, OP, Weight Distress) HRQoL measures

  • Attrition rates in included studies ranged from 8 to 39.2%

  • Included studies were heterogeneous with respect to baseline BMI, HRQoL instruments and surgical methods

10 Jumbe, 2015 22
  • Systematic review to assess psychosocial HRQoL of bariatric surgery patients at a minimum of 1‐year follow‐up compared to:

  • Individuals receiving non‐surgical interventions

  • Non‐treated comparison groups

  • 11 studies, including RCTs (2), prospective cohorts (8) and retrospective analysis (1) (SF‐36 measured at follow‐up only)

  • Bariatric surgery vs. non‐surgical treatment

    • For all 3 studies using the SF‐36 scale, bariatric surgery groups had better HRQoL outcomes vs. non‐surgical interventions

    • 1/3 studies using the SF‐36 scale reported significantly better outcomes across all subscales

  • Bariatric surgery vs. control groups

    • For 5 of the 7 studies assessing generic and/or obesity‐specific HRQoL pre‐and posttreatment, patients in surgical groups reported higher HRQoL vs. control groups at follow‐up

    • Improvements were seen in all or some of the mental/psychosocial aspects of HRQoL

  • Articles included both generic (SF‐36, SF‐12, EQ‐5D, SIP), and obesity‐specific measures (IWQOL‐Lite, OP)

  • Follow‐up ranged from 1 to 10 years

  • Study quality was evaluated

  • 2 studies assessed HRQoL in individuals with both obesity and diabetes 23, 24

  • 4 studies 25, 26, 27, 28 used data from the Utah Obesity Study; thus, reporting these studies separately may skew the conclusions

  • Conclusion of “persistent psychological issues post‐surgery” is an overstatement of the data presented in the reviewed studies

  • Despite better outcomes reported in 3 of the 4 studies comparing bariatric surgery with non‐surgical treatment, authors state that, overall, these studies show moderate evidence of similar improvements in HRQoL in these 2 groups

  • Despite reporting of improvements in mental/psychosocial HRQoL in several of the studies, authors state that long‐term psychosocial HRQoL does not improve after bariatric surgery compared to controls

11 Hachem et al., 2016 29
  • Systematic review to examine HRQoL as an outcome of bariatric surgery by comparing:

    • Bariatric surgery to alternative weight‐loss interventions

    • Different types of bariatric surgery

  • 13 studies

    • 7 studies (1 RCT, 6 quasi‐experimental studies): bariatric surgery vs. an alternative weight‐loss intervention

    • 6 studies (5 RCTs, 1 quasi‐experimental study): 1 type of bariatric surgery vs. another

  • English

  • Significant HRQoL improvements following bariatric surgery

    • Greater improvements in surgical vs. non‐surgical interventions

  • Significant HRQoL improvements in gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs. vertical banding gastroplasty and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, respectively

  • No differences in HRQoL between variations of the same type of surgery (e.g. gastric bypass vs. mini gastric bypass)

  • Articles included used generic (SF‐36, M–A QoLQII, SIP, GHRI), obesity‐specific (IWQOL‐Lite, OWLQOL, WRSM, GIQLI, QOLOD) and gastrointestinal‐specific HRQoL measures

  • Follow‐up ranged from 2 months to 10 years

  • 2 studies measured HRQoL post‐surgery only

  • 6 studies reported follow‐ups of ≤1 year

  • Results were not included for the 10‐year follow‐up of Karlsson et al. 30 or the 6‐year follow‐up of Adams et al. 27

  • Only 2 studies evaluated between‐group differences

  • Each comparison of different surgery types was made in only a single study

  • Reporting of HRQoL results was inconsistent, with some reporting overall scores, some reporting composite scores, and some reporting selected subscale scores

  • 2 included studies 31, 32 (studies by Canetti et al. in 2009 and 2013) used the same study sample

12 Driscoll et al., 2016 33
  • Systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies reporting HRQoL data ≥5 years after bariatric surgery and in non‐surgical control groups with obesity

  • 9 studies, including cross‐sectional studies (7), prospective cohort study (1), and non‐randomized controlled trial (1)

  • Systematic review of all studies and measures

    • Greater improvements were noted in both the physical and mental domains of HRQoL for the surgical groups compared with the control groups; however, there were inconsistencies in results (i.e. favouring surgical group, favouring control group, and no difference) in both physical and mental domains

  • Meta‐analysis of SF‐36 results

    • Inconsistencies that had been seen in the systematic review were not seen in the meta‐analysis

    • Significant improvement in all mental domains after 5 years favouring the surgical group compared with the controls; and 3/4 physical domains

  • The magnitude of improvement in surgical groups vs. control groups was greater for the physical than mental domains

  • Articles included used both generic (SF‐36, EQ‐5D, Current Health Scale from the GHRI and obesity‐specific (IWQOL‐Lite, OP) measures

  • Studies had follow‐up periods of 5 to 25 years

  • Meta‐analysis could only be conducted on studies reporting SF‐36 scores

HRQoL‐HSP is sometimes referred to as ‘Lewin‐TAG’.

15D, 15‐dimensional measure; EQ‐5D, EuroQuol‐5D measure; GHQ, General Health Questionnaire; GHRI, General Health Rating Index; GIQLI, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life measure; GWB, General Well‐Being measure; HRQoL, health‐related quality of life; HRQoL‐HSP, Health‐related quality of life‐Health State Preference Assessment; IWQOL, Impact of Weight on Quality of Life; IWQOL‐Lite, Impact of Weight on Quality of Life‐Lite; M–A QoLQII, Moorehead–Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II; NHP, Nottingham Health Profile; OAS, Obesity Adjustment Survey; OP, Obesity‐related Problems scale; ORWELL, Obesity‐Related Well‐Being questionnaire; OWLQOL, Obesity and Weight Loss Quality of Life; QOLOD, Quality of Life, Obesity and Dietetics Rating Scale; QWB, Quality of Well‐Being scale; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SF‐36, Medical Outcomes Study Short‐Form‐36; SIP, Sickness Impact Profile; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; WRSM, Weight‐Related Symptoms Measure.