Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2017 May 1;46(4):477–499. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1310044

TABLE 1.

Evidence Base Update Criteria

Methods Criteria
M.1. Group design: Study involved a randomized controlled design
M.2. Independent variable defined: Treatment manuals or logical equivalent were used for the treatment
M.3. Population clarified: Conducted with a population, treated for specified problems, for whom inclusion criteria have been clearly delineated
M.4. Outcomes assessed: Reliable and valid outcome assessment measures gauging the problems targeted (at a minimum) were used
M.5. Analysis adequacy: Appropriate data analyses were used & sample size was sufficient to detect expected effects
Level 1: Well-Established Treatments
1.1 Efficacy demonstrated for the treatment in at least two (2) independent research settings and by two (2) independent investigatory teams demonstrating efficacy by showing the treatment to be either:
1.1.a. Statistically significantly superior to pill or psychological placebo or to another active treatment
OR
1.1.b. Equivalent (or not significantly different) to an already well-established treatment in experiments
AND
1.2. All five (5) of the Methods Criteria
Level 2: Probably Efficacious Treatments
2.1. There must be at least two good experiments showing the treatment is superior (statistically significantly so) to a waitlist control group
OR
2.2. One or more good experiments meeting the well-established treatment level with the one exception of having been conducted in at least two independent research settings and by independent investigatory teams
AND
2.3. All five (5) of the Methods Criteria
Level 3: Possibly Efficacious Treatments
3.1. At least one good randomized controlled trial showing the treatment to be superior to a waitlist or no-treatment control group
AND
3.2. All five (5) of the Methods Criteria
OR
3.3. Two or more clinical studies showing the treatment to be efficacious, with two or more meeting the last four (of five) Methods Criteria, but none being randomized controlled trials
Level 4: Experimental Treatments
4.1. Not yet tested in a randomized controlled trial
OR
4.2. Tested in 1 or more clinical studies but not sufficient to meet Level 3 criteria.
Level 5: Treatments of Questionable Efficacy
5.1. Tested in good group-design experiments and found to be inferior to other treatment group and/or waitlist control group, that is, only evidence available from experimental studies suggests the treatment produces no beneficial effect.