Methods Criteria |
M.1. Group design: Study involved a randomized controlled design |
M.2. Independent variable defined: Treatment manuals or logical equivalent were used for the treatment |
M.3. Population clarified: Conducted with a population, treated for specified problems, for whom inclusion criteria have been clearly delineated |
M.4. Outcomes assessed: Reliable and valid outcome assessment measures gauging the problems targeted (at a minimum) were used |
M.5. Analysis adequacy: Appropriate data analyses were used & sample size was sufficient to detect expected effects |
Level 1: Well-Established Treatments |
1.1 Efficacy demonstrated for the treatment in at least two (2) independent research settings and by two (2) independent investigatory teams demonstrating efficacy by showing the treatment to be either: |
1.1.a. Statistically significantly superior to pill or psychological placebo or to another active treatment |
OR |
1.1.b. Equivalent (or not significantly different) to an already well-established treatment in experiments |
AND |
1.2. All five (5) of the Methods Criteria |
Level 2: Probably Efficacious Treatments |
2.1. There must be at least two good experiments showing the treatment is superior (statistically significantly so) to a waitlist control group |
OR |
2.2. One or more good experiments meeting the well-established treatment level with the one exception of having been conducted in at least two independent research settings and by independent investigatory teams |
AND |
2.3. All five (5) of the Methods Criteria |
Level 3: Possibly Efficacious Treatments |
3.1. At least one good randomized controlled trial showing the treatment to be superior to a waitlist or no-treatment control group |
AND |
3.2. All five (5) of the Methods Criteria |
OR |
3.3. Two or more clinical studies showing the treatment to be efficacious, with two or more meeting the last four (of five) Methods Criteria, but none being randomized controlled trials |
Level 4: Experimental Treatments |
4.1. Not yet tested in a randomized controlled trial |
OR |
4.2. Tested in 1 or more clinical studies but not sufficient to meet Level 3 criteria. |
Level 5: Treatments of Questionable Efficacy |
5.1. Tested in good group-design experiments and found to be inferior to other treatment group and/or waitlist control group, that is, only evidence available from experimental studies suggests the treatment produces no beneficial effect. |