Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2016 Mar 21;91:202–218. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.02.004

Table 2.

Accuracy (proportion of correct dative responses out of all responses), proportion of DO responses (out of all correct dative responses), and magnitude of priming effects (subtraction of proportion of DO responses across conditions), for control and agrammatic participants, by prime type, Experiment 1.

Accuracy
Group PO DO Provide-animate Provide-inanimate Overall
Control 0.97 (0.05) 0.95 (0.07) 0.97 (0.04) 0.97 (0.06) 0.97 (0.04)
Agrammatic 0.87 (0.11) 0.85 (0.13) 0.87 (0.16) 0.85 (0.16) 0.86 (0.11)
Proportion of DO responses
Group PO DO Provide-animate Provide-inanimate Overall
Control 0.32 (0.20) 0.59 (0.16) 0.61 (0.21) 0.54 (0.23) 0.52 (0.23)
Agrammatic 0.17 (0.14) 0.38 (0.24) 0.29 (0.27) 0.29 (0.17) 0.28 (0.22)
Magnitude of priming effects
Group Structural (DO - PO) Thematic-animate (Provide-animate - PO) Thematic- inanimate (Provide-inanimate - PO)
Control 0.27 (0.17) 0.29 (0.20) 0.22 (0.15)
Agrammatic 0.21 (0.22) 0.12 (0.21) 0.12 (0.12)

Note: Means (standard deviations) are provided. PO = prepositional object; DO = double object.