Table 3.
Parameters of mixed-effects regression models of priming effects, Experiment 1.
| Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priming Effects: Control Group | ||||
| Intercept | 0.108 | 0.239 | 0.452 | 0.651 |
| Prime Type: DO vs. PO | 1.221 | 0.261 | 4.675 | <0.001 |
| Prime Type: Provide-animate vs. PO | 1.370 | 0.282 | 4.853 | <0.001 |
| Prime Type: Provide-inanimate vs. PO | 1.097 | 0.295 | 3.725 | <0.001 |
| Prime Type: Provide-animate vs. DO | 0.150 | 0.272 | 0.550 | 0.582 |
| Prime Type: Provide-inanimate vs. DO | −0.123 | 0.294 | −0.419 | 0.675 |
| Prime Type: Provide-inanimate vs. Provide-animate | −0.273 | 0.272 | −1.004 | 0.315 |
| Priming Effects: Agrammatic Group | ||||
| Intercept | −1.177 | 0.305 | −3.857 | <0.001 |
| Prime Type: DO vs. PO | 1.138 | 0.341 | 3.337 | <0.001 |
| Prime Type: Provide-animate vs. PO | 0.418 | 0.413 | 1.014 | 0.311 |
| Prime Type: Provide-inanimate vs. PO | 0.739 | 0.341 | 2.165 | 0.030 |
| Prime Type: Provide-animate vs. DO | −0.720 | 0.357 | −2.019 | 0.043 |
| Prime Type: Provide-inanimate vs. DO | −0.399 | 0.302 | −1.323 | 0.186 |
| Prime Type: Provide-inanimate vs. Provide-animate | 0.321 | 0.392 | 0.819 | 0.413 |
| Priming Effects: Control and Agrammatic Groups | ||||
| Intercept | −0.519 | 0.189 | −2.744 | 0.006 |
| Group: Agrammatic vs. Control | −1.275 | 0.379 | −3.366 | <0.001 |
| Prime Type: DO vs. PO (Syntactic) | 1.196 | 0.204 | 5.869 | <0.001 |
| Prime Type: Provide-animate vs. PO (Thematic-animate) | 0.950 | 0.228 | 4.159 | <0.001 |
| Prime Type: Provide-inanimate vs. PO (Thematic-inanimate) | 0.849 | 0.211 | 4.028 | <0.001 |
| Group (Agrammatic vs. Control) × Prime Type: DO vs. PO (Syntactic) | −0.098 | 0.409 | −0.239 | 0.811 |
| Group (Agrammatic vs. Control) × Prime Type: Provide-animate vs. PO (Thematic-animate) | −0.937 | 0.472 | −1.986 | 0.047 |
| Group (Agrammatic vs. Control) × Prime Type: Provide-inanimate vs. PO (Thematic-inanimate) | −0.408 | 0.426 | −0.959 | 0.337 |