Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2016 Mar 21;91:202–218. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.02.004

Table 5.

Parameters of mixed-effects regression models of priming effects, Experiment 2.

Estimate Std. Error t-value p-value
Priming Effects: Control Group
Intercept −0.054 0.154 −0.351 0.725
Prime Type: DO vs. PO 0.842 0.173 4.879 <0.001
Lag: Lag 4 vs. Lag 2 0.148 0.174 0.851 0.395
Prime Type (DO vs. PO) × Lag (Lag 4 vs. Lag2) 0.025 0.348 0.071 0.944
Priming Effects: Aphasic Group
Intercept −1.060 0.235 −4.510 <0.001
Prime Type: DO vs. PO 0.906 0.238 3.810 <0.001
Lag: Lag 4 vs. Lag 2 −0.243 0.233 −1.045 0.296
Prime Type (DO vs. PO) × Lag (Lag 4 vs. Lag2) 0.228 0.456 0.500 0.617
Priming Effects: Control and Agrammatic Groups
(Intercept) −0.538 0.133 −4.053 <0.001
Prime Type: DO vs. PO 0.842 0.138 6.117 <0.001
Lag: Lag 4 vs. Lag 2 −0.016 0.137 −0.118 0.906
Group (Agrammatic vs. Control) −0.967 0.265 −3.652 <0.001
Prime Type (DO vs. PO) × Lag (Lag 4 vs. Lag 2) 0.073 0.274 0.267 0.790
Prime Type (DO vs. PO) × Group (Agrammatic vs. Control) −0.011 0.276 −0.040 0.968
Lag (Lag 4 vs. Lag 2) × Group (Agrammatic vs. Control) −0.329 0.273 −1.206 0.228
Prime Type (DO vs. PO) × Lag (Lag 4 vs. Lag 2) × Group (Agrammatic vs. Control) 0.080 0.547 0.147 0.883